Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using Ultramonkey/ldirectord? I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I can foresee is the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out for myself :-) Thanks
Matt
If you see another thread (using the rather intuitive subject: Re: [Serusers] more usrloc synchronization), you will see discussions on using LVS in general. AFAIK, which high availability solution to use for LVS, is more based on your personal preferences, UltraMonkey is probably a safe choice. Anyway, you will need to address the "stickiness" issue. g-)
Matt Schulte wrote:
Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using Ultramonkey/ldirectord? I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I can foresee is the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out for myself :-) Thanks
Matt
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I dunno if this is much help, as I haven't done much with load balancing, but i found this link on the Wiki in the Asterisk at Large section whilst looking for something else.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+at+large
Skip down to the SER, Asterisk and Lucent TNT example. It includes a sample config too...
http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg60425.html
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Schulte" mschulte@netlogic.net To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 12:09 AM Subject: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord
Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using Ultramonkey/ldirectord? I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I can foresee =s the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out for myself :-) Thanks
Matt
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Matt Schulte -
Rod Bacon