;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off.

Hi Mustafa, Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or something at the called end we don't know. Thanks, John. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; wrote:

Hi, Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - " The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party or some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly rejected " https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this destination and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. Thanks, John. On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa &lt;mustafa.pk(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow > > > > U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 > INVITE sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. > Record-Route: > <sip:134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;r2=on;lr;ftag=0S3pjXmBSU26m;did=ee1.07e2;nat=yes>. > Record-Route: > <sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-H46V93NbGr0i98SDs8FcP3QV9LAWw1abHkqWlXczwL7tH3TqJ40tJmTto.AEobzVSbGVu6ECQ6Gfs3oC94AUoXc6o8NDsXl6s3CDwjQqM1fb>. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > Max-Forwards: 66. > From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp>. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Contact: > <sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-H46V95lLx46FlN7isr0isX7Dsr0isXhcsXyV9LAWw1abHkqWlXccom7toLHqu1Az94pIu1pbv8NVP3NVsr0VP3NV-3Qb9Xyi-3T*>. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, > REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. > Supported: timer, path, replaces. > Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. > Content-Type: application/sdp. > Content-Disposition: session. > Content-Length: 329. > Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10 > >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. > User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. > P-hint: outbound. > . > v=0. > o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > s=NewAgeNetworks. > c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. > t=0 0. > m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 > > U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 > 01. > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. > a=fmtp:101 0-15. > a=sendrecv. > a=rtcp:32861. > a=ptime:20. > > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 > SIP/2.0 100 Trying. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x > ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: <sip:21x.xx.x.x:5060>. > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > > U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 > SIP/2.0 607. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. > From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. > To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x > ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. > Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. > Contact: <sip:21x.xx.x.x:5060>. > CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. > Server: sbc_5. > Content-Length: 0. > > Regards, > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI &lt;myfriendjohn1(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hi Mustafa, >> >> Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is >> in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself >> or something at the called end we don't know. >> >> Thanks, >> >> John. >> >> On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hello Kamailio Community, >>> >>> I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 >>> "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: >>> >>> May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: <core> >>> [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed >>> (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) >>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: <core> >>> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad >>> message (offset: 11) >>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: <core> >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<SIP/2.0 >>> 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: >>> SIP/2.0/UDP >>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: >>> "15516756486" <sip:15516756486@10.x.x.10>;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: >>> <sip:99904441743709685@36.53.xx.xx;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: >>> a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: >>> <sip:36.53.xx.xx:5060>#015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: >>> sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> >>> >>> And the actual SIP message is >>> >>> U 36.53.xx.xx:5060 -> 10.x.x.30:5060 #850 >>> SIP/2.0 607. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060 >>> ;branch=z9hG4bKbdbd.95060a558d66b77d258b8d0799be4cf0.0;i=2. >>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8 >>> ;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFCaHXyLA3G.SjwaAmdn. >>> From: "13xxxxxxxxxx" <sip:13xxxxxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=pFFatBpUc75BH. >>> To: <sip:441xxxxxxxxx@36.53.xx.xx >>> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C56639_20240531081932874_sbc04. >>> Call-ID: e0d2f5fa-99ea-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >>> Contact: <sip:36.53.xx.xx:5060>. >>> CSeq: 84025194 INVITE. >>> Server: sbc_5. >>> Content-Length: 0. >>> >>> Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Mustafa >>> >>> __________________________________________________________ >>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only >>> to the sender! >>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>> >>

I'm wondering how to handle situations where downstream send invalid messages. In this case, Kamailio is not able to send DELETE commands to rtpengine due to parsing errors, as a result rtpengine is consuming all available ports and causing instability in our VoIP infrastructure. Do you have any suggestions on how to mitigate this issue? Regards, On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:40 PM Who AmI &lt;myfriendjohn1(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for > other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be > the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - " > > The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party or > some UA-internal logic, uses this to indicate that this call is > unwanted and that future attempts are likely to be similarly > rejected > > " > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8197 > > Doesn't seem to be a Kamailio issue if it is only affecting this > destination and if it doesn't affect the service on the Kamailio itself. > > Thanks, > > John. > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 14:25, Ghulam Mustafa &lt;mustafa.pk(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow >> >> >> >> U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132 >> INVITE sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0. >> Record-Route: >> <sip:134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;r2=on;lr;ftag=0S3pjXmBSU26m;did=ee1.07e2;nat=yes>. >> Record-Route: >> <sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-H46V93NbGr0i98SDs8FcP3QV9LAWw1abHkqWlXczwL7tH3TqJ40tJmTto.AEobzVSbGVu6ECQ6Gfs3oC94AUoXc6o8NDsXl6s3CDwjQqM1fb>. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> Max-Forwards: 66. >> From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp>. >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Contact: >> <sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-H46V95lLx46FlN7isr0isX7Dsr0isXhcsXyV9LAWw1abHkqWlXccom7toLHqu1Az94pIu1pbv8NVP3NVsr0VP3NV-3Qb9Xyi-3T*>. >> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, >> REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY. >> Supported: timer, path, replaces. >> Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer. >> Content-Type: application/sdp. >> Content-Disposition: session. >> Content-Length: 329. >> Remote-Party-ID: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10 >> >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. >> User-Agent: NewAge Border Controller. >> P-hint: outbound. >> . >> v=0. >> o=NewAgeNetworks 1717145045 1717145046 IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >> s=NewAgeNetworks. >> c=IN IP4 134.xxx.xxx.xx. >> t=0 0. >> m=audio 32860 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 1 >> >> U 10.x.x.xx -> 21x.xx.x.x +32647@1480:182 #133 >> 01. >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. >> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. >> a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. >> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. >> a=fmtp:101 0-15. >> a=sendrecv. >> a=rtcp:32861. >> a=ptime:20. >> >> >> >> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #141 >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x >> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> Contact: <sip:21x.xx.x.x:5060>. >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Server: sbc_5. >> Content-Length: 0. >> . >> >> >> U 21x.xx.x.x:5060 -> 10.x.x.xx:5060 #181 >> SIP/2.0 607. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFILSblkHXdfw8lwo1lW. >> From: "1272xxxxxxx" <sip:1272xxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=0S3pjXmBSU26m. >> To: <sip:44xxxxxxxx@21x.xx.x.x >> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C6058_20240531091821072_sbc05. >> Call-ID: 17cb7d78-99f3-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >> Contact: <sip:21x.xx.x.x:5060>. >> CSeq: 84026958 INVITE. >> Server: sbc_5. >> Content-Length: 0. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:03 PM Who AmI &lt;myfriendjohn1(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hi Mustafa, >>> >>> Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is >>> in response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself >>> or something at the called end we don't know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John. >>> >>> On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users < >>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Kamailio Community, >>>> >>>> I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607 >>>> "Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are: >>>> >>>> May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR: <core> >>>> [core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed >>>> (36.53.xx.xx:5060/1) >>>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: <core> >>>> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:272]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad >>>> message (offset: 11) >>>> May 31 12:32:10 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320895]: ERROR: <core> >>>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:790]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<SIP/2.0 >>>> 607#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bKc87a.ed6403ae1529f36b65171bf964604be0.0;i=2#015#012Via: >>>> SIP/2.0/UDP >>>> 127.0.0.8;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFIzl5c9wbfNG3oaHkl3#015#012From: >>>> "15516756486" <sip:15516756486@10.x.x.10>;tag=KXtSBZ1at71Hc#015#012To: >>>> <sip:99904441743709685@36.53.xx.xx;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C35684_20240531083209909_sbc06#015#012Call-ID: >>>> a40d965d-99ec-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c#015#012Contact: >>>> <sip:36.53.xx.xx:5060>#015#012CSeq: 84025572 INVITE#015#012Server: >>>> sbc_5#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012> >>>> >>>> And the actual SIP message is >>>> >>>> U 36.53.xx.xx:5060 -> 10.x.x.30:5060 #850 >>>> SIP/2.0 607. >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 134.195.195.40:5060 >>>> ;branch=z9hG4bKbdbd.95060a558d66b77d258b8d0799be4cf0.0;i=2. >>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.8 >>>> ;branch=z9hG4bKsr-Sz6QPbTDsrqSQc7ys87Ds87VP37Ds87YG870sXCWo1G6ujo6oXzisr0isX7Dsr0isXCSZXcFujwtH.KOH.QqGXs09XNtw.dEJ5GhvjhauNHzwFCaHXyLA3G.SjwaAmdn. >>>> From: "13xxxxxxxxxx" <sip:13xxxxxxxxxx@10.x.x.10>;tag=pFFatBpUc75BH. >>>> To: <sip:441xxxxxxxxx@36.53.xx.xx >>>> ;transport=udp>;tag=sbcsipuas_1_C56639_20240531081932874_sbc04. >>>> Call-ID: e0d2f5fa-99ea-123d-6f92-ecf4bbd64f6c. >>>> Contact: <sip:36.53.xx.xx:5060>. >>>> CSeq: 84025194 INVITE. >>>> Server: sbc_5. >>>> Content-Length: 0. >>>> >>>> Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Mustafa >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only >>>> to the sender! >>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >>>> >>>