3 Jun
2012
3 Jun
'12
9:41 a.m.
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher entries
corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations available
for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the destination
are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
4 Jun
4 Jun
2:52 a.m.
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
input value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
entries corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one
destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
3:44 a.m.
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work the
way I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to
get the required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same input
value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher entries
corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
6:05 a.m.
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work the way
I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to get the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same input
value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher entries
corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:16 a.m.
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as
ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and random values
in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> do you get any errors in the log?
>
> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
input
> value, but there can be collisions of codes
for different values.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
> kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
entries
> corresponding to one set all calls go only to
only one destination.
>
>
> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
> id: 59f87e
> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
> [root@control1 ~]#
>
> Here is the dipacther module params.
>
>
>
> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
> modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
> modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
> modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col",
"destination")
> modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
> "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
> modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>
>
>
> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>
>
>
> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
> ds_load_update();
> if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
> sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:23 a.m.
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
input
value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
entries
corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6:33 a.m.
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I just
committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the
used hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> do you get any errors in the log?
>
> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
> input
> value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
> kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
> entries
> corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
>
>
> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
> id: 59f87e
> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
> [root@control1 ~]#
>
> Here is the dipacther module params.
>
>
>
> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
> modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
> modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
> modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col",
"destination")
> modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
> "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
> modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>
>
>
> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>
>
>
> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
> ds_load_update();
> if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
> sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
> available");
> xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
> available for $rd");
> exit;
> }
>
>
> I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
> destination are not hashed on its base.
>
> Please help.
>
> Regards,
> Sammy G.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
> http://asipto.com/u/katu
> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
6 Jun
6 Jun
12:09 p.m.
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I think Hashing algo code
needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you please let me
know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such
case, I just
committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-**bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=**commit;h=**
83a558fbad700198a8667ef01f7562**69d7e2c310<http://git.sip-router.org/cgi…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find
the used hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-**bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=**
blob;f=modules_k/dispatcher/**dispatch.c;h=**
ae0c51b122d34e29b3474957a64b24**ff492cfcd5;hb=HEAD<http://git.sip-router…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/**miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda&…
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
______________________________**_________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com>
wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Hi,
>
> No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no
> internal
> error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
> destination uri.
>
> So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work
> the
> way
> I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to
> get
> the
> required functionality.
>
> Thanks once again,
> BR
> SG
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> do you get any errors in the log?
>>
>> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
>> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
>> input
>> value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
>> kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
>> entries
>> corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
>>
>>
>> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
>> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
>> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
>> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
>> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>> id: 59f87e
>> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
>> [root@control1 ~]#
>>
>> Here is the dipacther module params.
>>
>>
>>
>> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
>> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col",
"destination")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
>> "class=2;code=403;code=404;**code=484;class=3")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>>
>>
>>
>> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>>
>>
>>
>> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
>> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
>> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
>> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\**n");
>> ds_load_update();
>> if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
>> sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
>> available");
>> xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
>> available for $rd");
>> exit;
>> }
>>
>>
>> I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
>> destination are not hashed on its base.
>>
>> Please help.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sammy G.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/**miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda&…
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…
>
>
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/**imprint/ <http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/>
______________________________**_________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…
______________________________**_________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http:/…
7 Jun
7 Jun
7:20 a.m.
Hello,
that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames and
has a fair distribution for such cases.
I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a number
is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file modulo
operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can provide
the right hints to do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I
think Hashing algo
code needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you
please let me know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I just
committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used
hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com <mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I
use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say
{26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>> wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to
generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the
number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of the
PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen,
that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for
your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see
a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into
debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm as
ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that
, for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and random values
in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return same
code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to
return same code for same
input
value, but there can be collisions of codes
for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in
dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that despite
multiple dispatcher
entries
corresponding to one set all calls go only to
only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS,
TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE
262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT
PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et,
sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name",
"dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col",
"setid")
modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col",
"destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar",
"$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire",
60)
Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map
where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)
---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500",
"No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] :
$rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for
avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep
23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep
10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>
Mobile +49 179 2021244 <tel:%2B49%20179%202021244>
Office +49 40 34927219 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927219>
Fax +49 40 34927220 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927220>
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
7:37 a.m.
Hi again,
yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups of those
users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one client whereas
other UID could've 3 users of another client.
So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same UID are
always routed to exactly one same destination server. That'll help in
issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference calls etc.
I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
Regards,
Sammy Go.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hello,
that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames and has
a fair distribution for such cases.
I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a number
is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file modulo
operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can provide the
right hints to do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I think Hashing algo code
needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you please let me
know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in
such case, I just
committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find
the used hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to generate an
> Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number hosts in
> your destination set.
> If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only two
> hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same host
> is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your PVAR...
> (e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a distribution.
>
> Carsten
>
> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug logs but no
>> internal
>> error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I only get one
>> destination uri.
>>
>> So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for this to work
>> the
>> way
>> I expect is to have more unique and random values in my hash_pvar to
>> get
>> the
>> required functionality.
>>
>> Thanks once again,
>> BR
>> SG
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> do you get any errors in the log?
>>>
>>> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for different input
>>> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code for same
>>> input
>>> value, but there can be collisions of codes for different values.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher module. Here is my
>>> kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple dispatcher
>>> entries
>>> corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one destination.
>>>
>>>
>>> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
>>> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
>>> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
>>> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
>>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>>> id: 59f87e
>>> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
>>> [root@control1 ~]#
>>>
>>> Here is the dipacther module params.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "table_name",
"dispatcher")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col",
"destination")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes",
>>> "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar",
"$avp(i:274)")
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 9)
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where accountcode =
>>> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
>>> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp) ---------
>>> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
>>> ds_load_update();
>>> if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
>>> sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
>>> available");
>>> xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
>>> available for $rd");
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
>>> destination are not hashed on its base.
>>>
>>> Please help.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sammy G.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>>> list
>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carsten Bock
> CEO (Geschäftsführer)
>
> ng-voice GmbH
> Schomburgstr. 80
> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
>
> http://www.ng-voice.com
> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
>
> Mobile +49 179 2021244 <%2B49%20179%202021244>
> Office +49 40 34927219 <%2B49%2040%2034927219>
> Fax +49 40 34927220 <%2B49%2040%2034927220>
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
> Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
> Ust-ID: DE279344284
>
> Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
> http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
12 Jun
12 Jun
5:43 a.m.
Hello,
if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo operation
to select the destination address -- this will require config operations
only.
Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id (e.g., via
mtree or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hi again,
yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups of
those users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one client
whereas other UID could've 3 users of another client.
So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same UID
are always routed to exactly one same destination server. That'll help
in issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference calls etc.
I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
Regards,
Sammy Go.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames
and has a fair distribution for such cases.
I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a
number is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file
modulo operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can
provide the right hints to do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very
helpful. I think Hashing
algo code needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility
can you please let me know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I
just committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used
hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to
servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change
if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets say
{26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash" function
to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this
to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values of
the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely
happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of
values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should
see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep
into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as calm
as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your email is
that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and random
values in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may return
same code for different input
values. A hash function is guaranteed to
return same code for same
input
value, but there can be collisions of
codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in
dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is that
despite multiple dispatcher
entries
corresponding to one set all calls go
only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP,
USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK,
SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024,
MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt,
epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc
4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name",
"dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col",
"setid")
modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col",
"destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode",
1)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar",
"$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size",
9)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on
avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map
where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)
---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for
avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA,
Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands,
Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>
Mobile +49 179 2021244 <tel:%2B49%20179%202021244>
Office +49 40 34927219 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927219>
Fax +49 40 34927220 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927220>
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen
Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kpw
6:01 a.m.
Thanks Sir,
Doing a static or even a run-time mapping of same UID calls to destination
server is what I thought about this type of case almost an year ago.
What I am thinking is : create a table for UID/Destination Mapping; for a
unique UID see if there is any destination in that table. If it exists just
jump to that server directly. If no UID/destination entry is found for that
UID then invoke Dispatcher; select destination, make call to it, and store
this in UID/destination map table !!
Let me know if there could be any improvement in this.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Sammy G.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo operation to
> select the destination address -- this will require config operations only.
>
> Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id (e.g., via mtree
> or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>
> Hi again,
> yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups of those
> users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one client whereas
> other UID could've 3 users of another client.
> So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same UID are
> always routed to exactly one same destination server. That'll help in
> issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference calls etc.
>
> I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
>
> Regards,
> Sammy Go.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames and
>> has a fair distribution for such cases.
>>
>> I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a number
>> is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file modulo
>> operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
>>
>> Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can provide the
>> right hints to do it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I think Hashing algo code
>> needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you please let me
>> know. !
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I just
>>> committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
>>>
>>>
>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
>>>
>>> Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used hash-function
here:
>>>>
>>>> 841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
>>>>
>>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
>>>>
>>>> It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
>>>> which worked fine.
>>>>
>>>> Carsten
>>>>
>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Sir,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use only
two
>>>>> values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000} ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Sammy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this functionality uses a generic "hash" function to
generate an
>>>>>> Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number
hosts in
>>>>>> your destination set.
>>>>>> If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and only
two
>>>>>> hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the same
host
>>>>>> is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your
PVAR...
>>>>>> (e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a
distribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into debug
logs but no
>>>>>>> internal
>>>>>>> error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I
only get
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> destination uri.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that , for
this to work
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>> I expect is to have more unique and random values in my
hash_pvar to
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> required functionality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks once again,
>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>> SG
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>> <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> do you get any errors in the log?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for
different
>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same code
for same
>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>> value, but there can be collisions of codes for different
values.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in dispatcher
module. Here is
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> kamailio version. The problem is that despite multiple
dispatcher
>>>>>>>> entries
>>>>>>>> corresponding to one set all calls go only to only one
destination.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
>>>>>>>> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
>>>>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS,
TLS_HOOKS,
>>>>>>>> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>>>>>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP,
>>>>>>>> PKG_MALLOC,
>>>>>>>> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>>>>>>> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN
>>>>>>>> 16,
>>>>>>>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>>>>>>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt,
select.
>>>>>>>> id: 59f87e
>>>>>>>> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]#
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the dipacther module params.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url",
DBURL)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "table_name",
"dispatcher")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col",
"setid")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col", "destination")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst",
1)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_probing_mode", 1)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
>>>>>>>> "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar",
"$avp(i:274)")
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_size", 9)
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where
accountcode =
>>>>>>>> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
>>>>>>>> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)
---------
>>>>>>>> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
>>>>>>>> ds_load_update();
>>>>>>>> if(!ds_select_dst("1","7"))
{
>>>>>>>> sl_send_reply("500",
"No destination
>>>>>>>> available");
>>>>>>>> xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No
destinations
>>>>>>>> available for $rd");
>>>>>>>> exit;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274)
{26,29} but the
>>>>>>>> destination are not hashed on its base.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Sammy G.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012
-
>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>>>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012
-
>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carsten Bock
>>>>>> CEO (Geschäftsführer)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ng-voice GmbH
>>>>>> Schomburgstr. 80
>>>>>> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com
>>>>>> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mobile +49 179 2021244
>>>>>> Office +49 40 34927219
>>>>>> Fax +49 40 34927220
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
>>>>>> Ust-ID: DE279344284
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>>>>>> list
>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>
>
>
>
13 Jun
13 Jun
4:23 a.m.
Hello,
On 6/12/12 12:01 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Thanks Sir,
Doing a static or even a run-time mapping of same UID calls to
destination server is what I thought about this type of case almost an
year ago.
What I am thinking is : create a table for UID/Destination Mapping;
for a unique UID see if there is any destination in that table. If it
exists just jump to that server directly. If no UID/destination entry
is found for that UID then invoke Dispatcher; select destination, make
call to it, and store this in UID/destination map table !!
Let me know if there could be any improvement in this.
can be a solution, indeed. You may have a race if that user does calls
in parallel first time and different destinations are selected -- not
sure it is the case for you.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks
Best Regards,
Sammy G.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo
operation to select the destination address -- this will require
config operations only.
Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id (e.g.,
via mtree or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Hi again,
yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups
of those users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one
client whereas other UID could've 3 users of another client.
So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same
UID are always routed to exactly one same destination server.
That'll help in issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference
calls etc.
I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
Regards,
Sammy Go.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric
usernames and has a fair distribution for such cases.
I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a
day, a number is already like a hash code. You can use in the
config file modulo operation to select a particular
destination based on a number.
Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can
provide the right hints to do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't
very helpful. I think
Hashing algo code needs to get bit smarter. If there is any
possibility can you please let me know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such
case, I just committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used
hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute
usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this will
change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other, lets
say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>> wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic "hash"
function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces
this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different values
of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely
happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider range of
values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then you
should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went too
deep into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was as
calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your
email is that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and
random values in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions may
return same code for different input
values. A hash function is
guaranteed to return same code for same
input
value, but there can be collisions
of codes for different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using algorithm 7
in dispatcher module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem is
that despite multiple dispatcher
entries
corresponding to one set all calls
go only to only one destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3
(x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6,
USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024,
MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt,
epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012
with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module params.
# ------- Load-balancer params ------
modparam("dispatcher", "db_url",
DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher", "table_name",
"dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col",
"setid")
modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col", "destination")
modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst",
1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3)
modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher", "hash_pvar",
"$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call based on
avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from
uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu
(IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No
destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different values for
avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
destination are not hashed on its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and
Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle,
USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop,
Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>
Mobile +49 179 2021244
<tel:%2B49%20179%202021244>
Office +49 40 34927219
<tel:%2B49%2040%2034927219>
Fax +49 40 34927220 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927220>
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen
Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER)
- sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26,
2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12,
2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/kpw
5:47 a.m.
Hi again,
Nice to read the comment from you. Yes it could be a case - but this race
condition will remain valid until I put some check on the insertion and
lock the resource if one user is using that table, I forgot what they say
in programming terms
What do you suggest i do to avoid this since I may have customers with SIP
trunks and I'd have to apply concurrent call limits to them using the same
logic.
Regards,
Sammy.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 6/12/12 12:01 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>
> Thanks Sir,
> Doing a static or even a run-time mapping of same UID calls to destination
> server is what I thought about this type of case almost an year ago.
>
> What I am thinking is : create a table for UID/Destination Mapping; for
> a unique UID see if there is any destination in that table. If it exists
> just jump to that server directly. If no UID/destination entry is found for
> that UID then invoke Dispatcher; select destination, make call to it, and
> store this in UID/destination map table !!
>
> Let me know if there could be any improvement in this.
>
>
> can be a solution, indeed. You may have a race if that user does calls in
> parallel first time and different destinations are selected -- not sure it
> is the case for you.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Best Regards,
> Sammy G.
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo operation to
>> select the destination address -- this will require config operations only.
>>
>> Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id (e.g., via mtree
>> or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>> yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups of those
>> users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one client whereas
>> other UID could've 3 users of another client.
>> So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same UID
>> are always routed to exactly one same destination server. That'll help in
>> issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference calls etc.
>>
>> I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sammy Go.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames and
>>> has a fair distribution for such cases.
>>>
>>> I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a number
>>> is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file modulo
>>> operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
>>>
>>> Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can provide
>>> the right hints to do it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I think Hashing algo
>>> code needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you please
>>> let me know. !
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I just
>>>> committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
>>>>
>>>> Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used
hash-function
>>>>> here:
>>>>>
>>>>> 841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
>>>>>
>>>>> It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to servers,
>>>>> which worked fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Sir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use
only two
>>>>>> values with huge difference in each other, lets say {26000,29000}
?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Sammy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> this functionality uses a generic "hash" function
to generate an
>>>>>>> Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the number
hosts
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> your destination set.
>>>>>>> If you have only using two different values of the PVAR and
only two
>>>>>>> hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that the
same
>>>>>>> host
>>>>>>> is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for your
PVAR...
>>>>>>> (e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a
distribution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into
debug logs but no
>>>>>>>> internal
>>>>>>>> error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever and I
only get
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> destination uri.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that ,
for this to
>>>>>>>> work the
>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> I expect is to have more unique and random values in my
hash_pvar
>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> required functionality.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks once again,
>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>> SG
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
>>>>>>>> <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> do you get any errors in the log?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Be aware that hash functions may return same code for
different
>>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>>> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return same
code for same
>>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>>> value, but there can be collisions of codes for
different values.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in
dispatcher module. Here is
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> kamailio version. The problem is that despite
multiple dispatcher
>>>>>>>>> entries
>>>>>>>>> corresponding to one set all calls go only to only
one destination.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
>>>>>>>>> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
>>>>>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS,
TLS_HOOKS,
>>>>>>>>> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>>>>>>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP,
>>>>>>>>> PKG_MALLOC,
>>>>>>>>> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>>>>>>>> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>>>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE
262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>>>>>> 16,
>>>>>>>>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE
4MB
>>>>>>>>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et,
sigio_rt, select.
>>>>>>>>> id: 59f87e
>>>>>>>>> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
>>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]#
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the dipacther module params.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "db_url",
DBURL)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"table_name", "dispatcher")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"setid_col", "setid")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col", "destination")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"force_dst", 1)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "flags",
3)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp",
"$avp(i:271)")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp",
"$avp(i:273)")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_probing_mode", 1)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
>>>>>>>>>
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_size", 9)
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map where
accountcode =
>>>>>>>>> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
>>>>>>>>> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu
(IP:$si:$sp) ---------
>>>>>>>>> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
>>>>>>>>> ds_load_update();
>>>>>>>>>
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
>>>>>>>>>
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
>>>>>>>>> available");
>>>>>>>>> xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm
: No destinations
>>>>>>>>> available for $rd");
>>>>>>>>> exit;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm getting two different values for avp(i:274)
{26,29} but the
>>>>>>>>> destination are not hashed on its base.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Sammy G.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing
>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26,
2012 -
>>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12,
2012 -
>>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Carsten Bock
>>>>>>> CEO (Geschäftsführer)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ng-voice GmbH
>>>>>>> Schomburgstr. 80
>>>>>>> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com
>>>>>>> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mobile +49 179 2021244 <%2B49%20179%202021244>
>>>>>>> Office +49 40 34927219 <%2B49%2040%2034927219>
>>>>>>> Fax +49 40 34927220 <%2B49%2040%2034927220>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
>>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
>>>>>>> Ust-ID: DE279344284
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
>>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>>>>>> list
>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
>>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda
- http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>
>
>
>
14 Jun
14 Jun
4:20 a.m.
Hello,
On 6/13/12 11:47 AM, SamyGo wrote:
Hi again,
Nice to read the comment from you. Yes it could be a case - but this
race condition will remain valid until I put some check on the
insertion and lock the resource if one user is using that table, I
forgot what they say in programming terms
What do you suggest i do to avoid this since I may have customers with
SIP trunks and I'd have to apply concurrent call limits to them using
the same logic.
you can use lock functions from cfgutils to synchronize on a resource
(like uid), should be better than locking an entire db table -- this
will require that the updates will be done only from config, not by
other applications.
Cheers,
Daniel
Regards,
Sammy.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 6/12/12 12:01 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Thanks Sir,
Doing a static or even a run-time mapping of same UID calls to
destination server is what I thought about this type of case
almost an year ago.
What I am thinking is : create a table for UID/Destination
Mapping; for a unique UID see if there is any destination in that
table. If it exists just jump to that server directly. If no
UID/destination entry is found for that UID then invoke
Dispatcher; select destination, make call to it, and store this
in UID/destination map table !!
Let me know if there could be any improvement in this.
can be a solution, indeed. You may have a race if that user does
calls in parallel first time and different destinations are
selected -- not sure it is the case for you.
Cheers,
Daniel
Thanks
Best Regards,
Sammy G.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo
operation to select the destination address -- this will
require config operations only.
Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id
(e.g., via mtree or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Hi again,
yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and
groups of those users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70
users of one client whereas other UID could've 3 users of
another client.
So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one
same UID are always routed to exactly one same destination
server. That'll help in issues like call-parking,
call-pickup, conference calls etc.
I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
Regards,
Sammy Go.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric
usernames and has a fair distribution for such cases.
I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of
a day, a number is already like a hash code. You can use
in the config file modulo operation to select a
particular destination based on a number.
Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement,
we can provide the right hints to do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/kpw
Sorry for late reply: this wasn't
very helpful. I think
Hashing algo code needs to get bit smarter. If there is
any possibility can you please let me know. !
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>
wrote:
To make the life easier to spot the hash code in
such case, I just committed a small patch to print
it for alg 7:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the
used hash-function here:
841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
It was originally implemented to distribute
usernames to servers,
which worked fine.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Thanks Sir,
Thats what I expected. Do you think this
will change if I use only two
values with huge difference in each other,
lets say {26000,29000} ?
Regards,
Sammy
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten
Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>> wrote:
Hi,
this functionality uses a generic
"hash" function to generate an
Integer-Value of the PVAR and then
reduces this to the number hosts in
your destination set.
If you have only using two different
values of the PVAR and only two
hosts in the dispatcher list, it can
likely happen, that the same host
is choosen. You should try a wider
range of values for your PVAR...
(e.g. try 1000 different values), then
you should see a distribution.
Carsten
2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com
<mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>:
Hi,
No, nothing at all. I haven't went
too deep into debug logs but no
internal
error was appearing. Everything was
as calm as ever and I only get one
destination uri.
So maybe what I'm getting from your
email is that , for this to work the
way
I expect is to have more unique and
random values in my hash_pvar to get
the
required functionality.
Thanks once again,
BR
SG
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
do you get any errors in the log?
Be aware that hash functions
may return same code for
different input
values. A hash function is
guaranteed to return same code
for same
input
value, but there can be
collisions of codes for
different values.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble using
algorithm 7 in dispatcher
module. Here is my
kamailio version. The problem
is that despite multiple dispatcher
entries
corresponding to one set all
calls go only to only one
destination.
[root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.2.3
(x86_64/linux) 59f87e
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6,
USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024,
MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE
65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll,
epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt,
select.
id: 59f87e
compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19
2012 with gcc 4.1.2
[root@control1 ~]#
Here is the dipacther module
params.
# ------- Load-balancer params
------
modparam("dispatcher",
"db_url", DBURL)
modparam("dispatcher",
"table_name", "dispatcher")
modparam("dispatcher",
"setid_col", "setid")
modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col",
"destination")
modparam("dispatcher",
"force_dst", 1)
modparam("dispatcher", "flags",
3)
modparam("dispatcher",
"dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
modparam("dispatcher",
"cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_from",
"sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_probing_mode", 1)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
modparam("dispatcher",
"hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_size", 9)
modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
Below is the function call
based on avp(i:274)
avp_db_query("select uid from
uid_did_map where accountcode =
'$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu
(IP:$si:$sp) ---------
UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
ds_load_update();
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
sl_send_reply("500", "No
destination
available");
xlog("route[MAIN] : $rm : No
destinations
available for $rd");
exit;
}
I'm getting two different
values for avp(i:274) {26,29}
but the
destination are not hashed on
its base.
Please help.
Regards,
Sammy G.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and
Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training,
Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop,
Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and
Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
<mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>
Mobile +49 179 2021244
<tel:%2B49%20179%202021244>
Office +49 40 34927219
<tel:%2B49%2040%2034927219>
Fax +49 40 34927220
<tel:%2B49%2040%2034927220>
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg,
HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere
handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep
23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep
10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012
-http://asipto.com/u/kpw
4:48 a.m.
Thanks once again, it was helpful. I am trying it for now and will get back
if anything else is required.
Great help from you and once again Thanks alot.
Best Regards,
Sammy G.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 6/13/12 11:47 AM, SamyGo wrote:
>
> Hi again,
> Nice to read the comment from you. Yes it could be a case - but this race
> condition will remain valid until I put some check on the insertion and
> lock the resource if one user is using that table, I forgot what they say
> in programming terms
>
> What do you suggest i do to avoid this since I may have customers with
> SIP trunks and I'd have to apply concurrent call limits to them using the
> same logic.
>
>
> you can use lock functions from cfgutils to synchronize on a resource
> (like uid), should be better than locking an entire db table -- this will
> require that the updates will be done only from config, not by other
> applications.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> Regards,
> Sammy.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/12 12:01 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Sir,
>> Doing a static or even a run-time mapping of same UID calls to
>> destination server is what I thought about this type of case almost an year
>> ago.
>>
>> What I am thinking is : create a table for UID/Destination Mapping; for
>> a unique UID see if there is any destination in that table. If it exists
>> just jump to that server directly. If no UID/destination entry is found for
>> that UID then invoke Dispatcher; select destination, make call to it, and
>> store this in UID/destination map table !!
>>
>> Let me know if there could be any improvement in this.
>>
>>
>> can be a solution, indeed. You may have a race if that user does calls
>> in parallel first time and different destinations are selected -- not sure
>> it is the case for you.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Best Regards,
>> Sammy G.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> if you are using integer UID, I would suggest you use modulo operation
>>> to select the destination address -- this will require config operations
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Another option you can map an UID to a dispatcher set id (e.g., via
>>> mtree or htable) and then you can do the alg 8.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/7/12 1:37 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi again,
>>> yes my scenario is quiet simple. I've lots of users and groups of
>>> those users are defined by UIDs, one UID means 70 users of one client
>>> whereas other UID could've 3 users of another client.
>>> So what I am trying to implement here is that calls from one same UID
>>> are always routed to exactly one same destination server. That'll help
in
>>> issues like call-parking, call-pickup, conference calls etc.
>>>
>>> I hope I've explained the scenario in simpler terms here.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sammy Go.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> that hash function is intended for hashing alpha-numeric usernames and
>>>> has a fair distribution for such cases.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think is good for hashing numbers, at the end of a day, a
>>>> number is already like a hash code. You can use in the config file
modulo
>>>> operation to select a particular destination based on a number.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe if you explain what is your target to implement, we can provide
>>>> the right hints to do it.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/6/12 6:09 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for late reply: this wasn't very helpful. I think Hashing algo
>>>> code needs to get bit smarter. If there is any possibility can you
please
>>>> let me know. !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>>> miconda(a)gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> To make the life easier to spot the hash code in such case, I just
>>>>> committed a small patch to print it for alg 7:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=83a558f…
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be easy to backport if other version is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/4/12 12:23 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's hard to say, most likely not. You find the used
hash-function
>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 841 unsigned int ds_get_hash(str *x, str *y)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was originally implemented to distribute usernames to
servers,
>>>>>> which worked fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Sir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thats what I expected. Do you think this will change if I use
only
>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>> values with huge difference in each other, lets say
{26000,29000} ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Sammy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Carsten Bock
<carsten(a)ng-voice.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this functionality uses a generic "hash"
function to generate an
>>>>>>>> Integer-Value of the PVAR and then reduces this to the
number hosts
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> your destination set.
>>>>>>>> If you have only using two different values of the PVAR
and only two
>>>>>>>> hosts in the dispatcher list, it can likely happen, that
the same
>>>>>>>> host
>>>>>>>> is choosen. You should try a wider range of values for
your PVAR...
>>>>>>>> (e.g. try 1000 different values), then you should see a
>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/6/4 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, nothing at all. I haven't went too deep into
debug logs but no
>>>>>>>>> internal
>>>>>>>>> error was appearing. Everything was as calm as ever
and I only get
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>> destination uri.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So maybe what I'm getting from your email is that
, for this to
>>>>>>>>> work the
>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>> I expect is to have more unique and random values in
my hash_pvar
>>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> required functionality.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks once again,
>>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>>> SG
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
>>>>>>>>> <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> do you get any errors in the log?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Be aware that hash functions may return same code
for different
>>>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>>>> values. A hash function is guaranteed to return
same code for same
>>>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>>>> value, but there can be collisions of codes for
different values.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/12 3:41 PM, SamyGo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm having trouble using algorithm 7 in
dispatcher module. Here
>>>>>>>>>> is my
>>>>>>>>>> kamailio version. The problem is that despite
multiple dispatcher
>>>>>>>>>> entries
>>>>>>>>>> corresponding to one set all calls go only to
only one
>>>>>>>>>> destination.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]# kamailio -V
>>>>>>>>>> version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e
>>>>>>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS,
TLS_HOOKS,
>>>>>>>>>> USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>>>>>>>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP,
>>>>>>>>>> PKG_MALLOC,
>>>>>>>>>> DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
>>>>>>>>>> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>>>>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE
262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>>>>>>> 16,
>>>>>>>>>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT
PKG_SIZE 4MB
>>>>>>>>>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et,
sigio_rt, select.
>>>>>>>>>> id: 59f87e
>>>>>>>>>> compiled on 18:04:08 Apr 19 2012 with gcc 4.1.2
>>>>>>>>>> [root@control1 ~]#
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the dipacther module params.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> # ------- Load-balancer params ------
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"db_url", DBURL)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"table_name", "dispatcher")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"setid_col", "setid")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"destination_col", "destination")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"force_dst", 1)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"flags", 3)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@109.XXX.2XX.XX"
>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_interval",15)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_probing_mode", 1)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_ping_reply_codes",
>>>>>>>>>>
"class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"hash_pvar", "$avp(i:274)")
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_size", 9)
>>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher",
"ds_hash_initexpire", 60)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Below is the function call based on avp(i:274)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> avp_db_query("select uid from uid_did_map
where accountcode =
>>>>>>>>>> '$fU'","$avp(i:274)");
>>>>>>>>>> xlog("L_INFO","$rm from $fu
(IP:$si:$sp) ---------
>>>>>>>>>> UID:'$avp(i:274)-----------'\n");
>>>>>>>>>> ds_load_update();
>>>>>>>>>>
if(!ds_select_dst("1","7")) {
>>>>>>>>>>
sl_send_reply("500", "No destination
>>>>>>>>>> available");
>>>>>>>>>> xlog("route[MAIN] :
$rm : No destinations
>>>>>>>>>> available for $rd");
>>>>>>>>>> exit;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting two different values for
avp(i:274) {26,29} but the
>>>>>>>>>> destination are not hashed on its base.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please help.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Sammy G.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users
>>>>>>>>>> mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep
23-26, 2012 -
>>>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep
10-12, 2012 -
>>>>>>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing
>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Carsten Bock
>>>>>>>> CEO (Geschäftsführer)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ng-voice GmbH
>>>>>>>> Schomburgstr. 80
>>>>>>>> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com
>>>>>>>> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mobile +49 179 2021244 <%2B49%20179%202021244>
>>>>>>>> Office +49 40 34927219 <%2B49%2040%2034927219>
>>>>>>>> Fax +49 40 34927220 <%2B49%2040%2034927220>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
>>>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
>>>>>>>> Ust-ID: DE279344284
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen
Pflichtangaben:
>>>>>>>> http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing
>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
>>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda
- http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/katu
>> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 -
http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
> Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
>
>
>
>
4478
days inactive
4489
days old
15 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Carsten Bock -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
SamyGo