8 Apr
2003
8 Apr
'03
8:44 a.m.
it turned out that cisco ios sip implementation does not include the new
route uri parameters (ftag, lr) that cvs ser adds in its record route
entry in the requests (ack, bye, ...) that cisco sends within a dialog.
what i heard is that it may take until the end of the year until these
bugs get fixed.
thus there is even more reasons to push cisco to get their acts together
or find a better sip/pstn gw from some other vendor (so far i haven't
heard of any).
-- juha
8 Apr
8 Apr
11:16 a.m.
I would want Cisco to add the Globalipsound (ilbc) codec to their ASes.
we're looking for alternatives until this is done.
The Internet Foundation Austria (which I chair) will likely fund asterisk
to include the freeware ilbc codec into the Asterisk IP PBX. We're also
funding them to include ENUM lookup in the call processing.
At $1600 per 4 PRI ports card, and a Linux PC around it to power it, this
cant be beaten - and it does have a SIP UA (and a server, unsure about this
- documentation is fuzzy, gotta read the code). I'm unsure how scalable the
thing is; however, at this stage I dont care - yet. And having the SIP code
in source at this stage is also very valuable.
this might not be the times for off-the-shelf gateways yet
-Michael
At 08:44 08.04.2003 +0300, Juha Heinanen wrote:
it turned out that cisco ios sip implementation does
not include the new
route uri parameters (ftag, lr) that cvs ser adds in its record route
entry in the requests (ack, bye, ...) that cisco sends within a dialog.
what i heard is that it may take until the end of the year until these
bugs get fixed.
thus there is even more reasons to push cisco to get their acts together
or find a better sip/pstn gw from some other vendor (so far i haven't
heard of any).
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
10 Apr
10 Apr
10:20 p.m.
At 07:44 AM 4/8/2003, Juha Heinanen wrote:
thus there is even more reasons to push cisco to get
their acts together
or find a better sip/pstn gw from some other vendor (so far i haven't
heard of any).
That depends on what gateway size you are looking for. If that is enterprise,
someone told me that VegaStream was doing a good job. I haven't had opportunity
yet to get it to our labs.
If anyone has the possibility to get ISDN/analog gateways to our labs, we
can allocate cycles to torturing it and sharing how it was doing. I'ld be
interested in seeing an alternative.
-Jiri
11 Apr
11 Apr
8:08 a.m.
Jiri Kuthan writes:
That depends on what gateway size you are looking for.
If that is
enterprise, someone told me that VegaStream was doing a good job. I
haven't had opportunity yet to get it to our labs.
some people have recommended me asterisk and i downloaded the software
yesterday. for asterisk they are selling 4xE1 cards at usd 1495, which
is a good deal provided that the cards and the software can do the job.
so far i have had problems with registering asterisk with ser (it seems
to always use ip address instead of a name in the host part of uri and i
have not been able to give authentication username separately from the
uri). also, i haven't been able to figure out, how it could be
configured to to forward all calls it gets from the isdn side to ser and
wise versa ...
-- juha
7898
days inactive
7901
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jiri Kuthan -
Juha Heinanen -
Michael Haberler