Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new mediaproxy version. 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a increasing amount of RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's happening. Is this something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, i'm still confuse with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the cause of the increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way to debug the mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's going on?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your first email. So AFAIK, that is OK.
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. What about the tear down of the sessions?
Thanks!
Regards, Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
Ricardo,
I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource leaks have been fixed.
Perhaps you can try version 1.2
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
mediaproxy running.
Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing.
It seems like
for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
used in RAM. You
can look this in the next lines :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM
TIME CPU COMMAND
1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4
19:22 0
mediaproxy.py
Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a missconfiguration in my ser.cfg?
I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions
with mediaproxy
also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido
--> terminando la
sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break; };
Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
determine which
ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You
can see for example
this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
be active even
before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
IP's in the output
of the session.py)
Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k inactive 0'02" Unknown Audio 0/0/0
Can someone tell me what's happening? I'm runnig : [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0
Thanks in advance. Regards,
Ricardo M.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I call end_media_session() for __every__ BYE or CANCEL message that my SIP proxy handles.
Are you doing something similiar?
Regards, Paul
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:46:05 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new mediaproxy version. 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a increasing amount of RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's happening. Is this something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, i'm still confuse with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the cause of the increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way to debug the mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's going on?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your first email. So AFAIK, that is OK.
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. What about the tear down of the sessions?
Thanks!
Regards, Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
Ricardo,
I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource leaks have been fixed.
Perhaps you can try version 1.2
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
mediaproxy running.
Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing.
It seems like
for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
used in RAM. You
can look this in the next lines :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM
TIME CPU COMMAND
1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4
19:22 0
mediaproxy.py
Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a missconfiguration in my ser.cfg?
I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions
with mediaproxy
also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido
--> terminando la
sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break; };
Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
determine which
ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You
can see for example
this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
be active even
before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
IP's in the output
of the session.py)
Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k inactive 0'02" Unknown Audio 0/0/0
Can someone tell me what's happening? I'm runnig : [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0
Thanks in advance. Regards,
Ricardo M.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be this could help you:
http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new mediaproxy version. 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a increasing amount of RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's happening. Is this something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, i'm still confuse with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the cause of the increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way to debug the mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's going on?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your first email. So AFAIK, that is OK.
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. What about the tear down of the sessions?
Thanks!
Regards, Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
Ricardo,
I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource leaks have been fixed.
Perhaps you can try version 1.2
Regards, Paul
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote:
Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
mediaproxy running.
Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing.
It seems like
for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
used in RAM. You
can look this in the next lines :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM
TIME CPU COMMAND
1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4
19:22 0
mediaproxy.py
Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a missconfiguration in my ser.cfg?
I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions
with mediaproxy
also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido
--> terminando la
sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break; };
Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
determine which
ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You
can see for example
this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
be active even
before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
IP's in the output
of the session.py)
Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k inactive 0'02" Unknown Audio 0/0/0
Can someone tell me what's happening? I'm runnig : [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0
Thanks in advance. Regards,
Ricardo M.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of "idle" RTP connections then you are probably not ending your media sessions with end_media_session().
Regards, Paul
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz acruz@tekbrain.com wrote:
If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be this could help you:
http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
Regards
Alberto Cruz
Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new mediaproxy version. 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a increasing amount of RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's happening. Is this something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, i'm still confuse with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the cause of the increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way to debug the mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's going on? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.- -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you showed in your first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote: Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. What about the tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards, Ricardo.- -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on mediaproxy-1.2 say that some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you can try version 1.2 Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez rmartinez@redvoiss.net wrote: Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the mediaproxy running. Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is increasing. It seems like for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources used in RAM. You can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0 mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of mediaproxy or maybe a missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a question regarding to tear down sessions with mediaproxy also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido --> terminando la sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; t_relay(); break; }; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to determine which ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You can see for example this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to be active even before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination IP's in the output of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
--- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k inactive 0'02" Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me what's happening? I'm runnig : [root mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0 Thanks in advance. Regards, Ricardo M. _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers