sr-users May 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

52 participants
100 discussions

[Serusers] Memory leak?
by Jamin W. Collins 28 May '03

28 May '03

Got the following errors on one of the SER proxies I maintain this morning: May 27 09:00:03 hillcrest /usr/sbin/ser[8260]: ERROR:receive_msg: memory allocation failure May 27 09:00:03 hillcrest /usr/sbin/ser[8264]: ERROR: build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory May 27 09:00:03 hillcrest /usr/sbin/ser[8264]: ERROR: print_uac_request: no pkg_mem May 27 09:00:03 hillcrest /usr/sbin/ser[8264]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 567 May 27 09:00:03 hillcrest /usr/sbin/ser[8264]: WARNING: receive_msg: error while trying script The server is running 0.8.10 with the following patches: http://www.iptel.org/ser/issues/hash_fix.patch http://iptel.org/~janakj/invroute.patch http://www.iptel.org/ser/security/secalert-002-0_8_10.patch http://www.mobile-ip.de/~andrei/ser/0.8.10/ser-0.8.10-bison-1.75.patch Of these, the only one the indicates memory errors is the invroute.patch. Has anyone seen this before? If necessary, I have ngrep captures for the time period. -- Jamin W. Collins Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar

2 7

Re: [Serusers] SER is not matching ACK Messages
by Jiri Kuthan 28 May '03

28 May '03

At 11:57 PM 5/25/2003, Nils Ohlmeier wrote: >Ok i first overlooked a problem in the messages. >I think the ATA is guilty because the request URI of the ACK is not the same >as the URI from the INVITE. And if i'm not wrong the URIs has to be the same >because the ACK for a negative reply belongs to the transaction. Thanks Nils -- indeed, that's an ATA bug -- the URIs must be the same. To fix the problem, I urge ATA users to urge Cisco. You can use some workarounds (like disabling tm "ruri_matching" tm parameter in the about to be released ser 0.8.11 version) but ATA is the primary place to fix. Actually, the best thing to do with ATA is to use RFC-3261 transaction matching -- 2541 matching has been obsoleted quite a while ago. -jiri

4 6

[Serusers] Serctl Command on Solaris 2.8
by Ricardo Villa 28 May '03

28 May '03

The serctl script has problems on a standard Solaris 8 Install: # serctl ul add 1000 sip:1000@10.10.10.10 grep: illegal option -- E Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . . sip:1000@10.10.10.10 is not a valid URI # It turns out that the normal "grep" command on Solaris does not include the "-E" option. You have to use /usr/xpg4/bin/grep instead. I modified the line: check_uri() { # echo "$1" | grep -E "^sip:([a-zA-Z0-9_]+@)?.*\..*" echo "$1" | /usr/xpg4/bin/grep -E "^sip:([a-zA-Z0-9_]+@)?.*\..*" and it seems to be working ok. Just though other Solaris users might want to know. Regards, Ricardo

2 1

[Serusers] address already in use ,,, in error_log
by Rami Francis 27 May '03

27 May '03

Hello All, I am getting a "forbidden acces from the Apache", I am trying 127.0.0.1 ,,, In the error_log file it says: "(crit) (98) Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to port 80" please I need help on that , thank you

2 1

[Serusers] Stateless Redirect Server
by matthieu saunier 27 May '03

27 May '03

Hi everybody, I'm currently testing ser (0.8.10) as a stateless redirect server with Kphone (3.1) as UA and I wonder why Kphone didn't try all URIs after receiving REDIRECT message from ser but only the one add with rewriteuri() function ? Nevertheless this REDIRECT effectively contains in his Contact Header field both URIs add with rewriteuri() and append_branch(). Kphone seems not to try URIs which are add to destination set with append_branch()... Can someone explain me why, or REDIRECT :-) me to the good way of thought ??? Regards, Matthieu Here is my ser config file : # # $Id: test_ser.cfg,v 1.12 09/05/2003 17:13:00 matthieu saunier $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 fork=yes log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=2 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- route{ if (uri==myself) { log("URI MATCHED"); log(1,"REDIRECTING"); # rewrite current URI, which is always part of destination ser rewriteuri("sip:rewriteuri@172.25.49.133:5062"); # append one more URI to the destination set append_branch("sip:appendbranch@172.25.49.133:5063"); # redirect now sl_send_reply("300", "redirect"); }; }

1 0

[Serusers] Forbidden from Apache
by Rami Francis 27 May '03

27 May '03

my apache is giving me Forbidden, I really don't know why. does any one have any suggestion ,, thanks rami

1 0

[Serusers] "Forbidden" by apache
by Rami Francis 27 May '03

27 May '03

I am getting a "Forbidden" reply from the Apache. The Apache is ponting to the index.php for the serweb. I've only changes the IP address of the local host to 127.0.0.1 in the config.php. Does anyone have any suggestions ? Thank you Best regards Rami

2 1

[Serusers] Unregister
by magnus melin 26 May '03

26 May '03

Hallo When trying to unregister SER response the 200 OK contact header contains expire=3392 shouldent it be 0. According to RFC 3261: 8. The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response. The response MUST contain Contact header field values enumerating all current bindings. Each Contact value MUST feature an "expires" parameter indicating its expiration interval chosen by the registrar. The response SHOULD include a Date header field. Trace from the unregister: Session Initiation Protocol Request line: REGISTER sip:172.18.3.164;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.1.66:5061;branch=z9hG4bK7cd705dd53972643a94681a4ce431160 Contact: "w" <sip:w@172.18.1.66:5061>;methods="MESSAGE";expires=0 Call-Id: de06a67588716c53ac5521929699d262(a)172.18.1.66 CSeq: 3 REGISTER From: "w" <sip:w@e-horizon.se>;tag=8331 To: "w(a)e-horizon.se" <sip:w@e-horizon.se> Content-Length: 0 Status line: SIP/2.0 200 OK Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.1.66:5061;branch=z9hG4bK7cd705dd53972643a94681a4ce431160 Call-Id: de06a67588716c53ac5521929699d262(a)172.18.1.66 CSeq: 3 REGISTER From: "w" <sip:w@e-horizon.se>;tag=8331 To: "w(a)e-horizon.se" <sip:w@e-horizon.se>;tag=a12148d613273d13cea75bbc18673103.bac8 Contact: <sip:w@172.18.1.66:5061>;q=0.00;expires=3392 Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.11pre13 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Regards Magnus

3 3

Re: [Serusers] Doubt in serctl script
by Jiri Kuthan 26 May '03

26 May '03

"dul" was an outdated call to "delete user location", which cleared all user contacts. I updated it on CVS to "ul rm". Thanks for reporting this. -Jiri At 09:47 PM 5/22/2003, Alejandro Olchik wrote: >Looking at the serctl rm command the followin shell >script is found: > > rm) > if [ $# -ne 2 ] ; then > usage > exit 1 > fi > shift > prompt_pw > > is_user $1 > if [ $? -ne 0 ] ; then > echo non-existent user > exit 1 > fi > > QUERY="delete from $TABLE where >$TABLE.$SUBSCRIBER_COLUMN='$1'" > sql_query "$QUERY" > > $0 acl revoke $1 > /dev/null 2>&1 > $0 dul $1 > /dev/null 2>&1 > ;; > >What does $0 dul $1... do? > >Anybody knows? > > >Alejandro > > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

[Serusers] Index.php
by Rami Francis 26 May '03

26 May '03

I pointed the Apache to index.php file, but the serweb is not working ,, the browser gives back ,, "connection refused". any suggestions thank you

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2003