-----Original Message-----
From: Vitaly Nikolaev
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:15 AM
To: 'daniel(a)iptel.org'
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA
SER B2BUA is mif, anybody ever seen it ? only webpage on the site.
Iptel ignoring all my inquires about this product.
Can anybody recommend me commercial B2BUA ? Or trik how can I get one
from iptel? I really need id ASAP.
Thank you
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 5:21 AM
To: ser
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA
On 7/23/2004 8:24 AM, ser wrote:
> What is the missing functionnality that miss to ser to be a B2BUA ??
>
The functionality missing is the B2BUA functionality ;-) . If you look
for a commercial solution of B2BUA, see http://www.iptel.org/aa/.
> (i was sure it could work in statefull mode).
>
It works in satefull mode -- transaction statefull -- using tm module.
Daniel
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Robert,
Make sure you have the following statements in httpd.conf:
DirectoryIndex index.phtml index.php index.html index.htm
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
AddType application/x-httpd-php .phtml
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php4
AddType application/x-httpd-php .inc
And (distro dependent) in modules.conf:
LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so
Regards,
Adrian
>>>>>>>>
I have done what I believe is a simple install and followed all of the
configuration instructions to the letter. I must have missed something
as I
cannot get the login page to function at all. I get a 404 error on login
every time. I am new to php and am a little green in this type of code.
I
get the following error in the url line upon login. Can someone please
help?
http://xx.xx.xx.xx/CDRTool/<?php%20print%20$this->url()?>
Some ideas:
1. For calls from PSTN to SIP use ENUM to map E164 number into SIP
addresses
2. For calls from SIP to PSTN insert a Remote-Party-Id for each SIP
account. For calls without Remote Party-Id you may decide to block them
or assigned special CLI at the gateway
Both are operator controlled and cannot be impersonated by end users.
Adrian
>>>>>>>>>
Hello,
If you map your users with usernames and a PSTN alias number, you can
reach SIP clients from PSTN.
However, is there a smart way of rewriting the Contact address for
outgoing PSTN requests?
Usually the PSTN gateway receives the username as From/Contact, and the
gateway will use probably the first number in its routing table or a
number defined by the Telco for calls without a Calling number entry.
Br,
hw
Hello,
If you map your users with usernames and a PSTN alias number, you can
reach SIP clients from PSTN.
However, is there a smart way of rewriting the Contact address for
outgoing PSTN requests?
Usually the PSTN gateway receives the username as From/Contact, and the
gateway will use probably the first number in its routing table or a
number defined by the Telco for calls without a Calling number entry.
Br,
hw
Hello,
I know this is not an error but I was just wondering what the
'connection not found in the pool' messages indicate..is this
because of a malconfigured db uri?
0(0) init_unixsock_socket: No unix domain socket will be opened
1(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): tm
1(0) DEBUG: callid: '4afafbdf-0(a)212.71.0.60'
1(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): nathelper
1(0) rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled
1(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): usrloc
1(0) get_connection(): Connection not found in the pool
1(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): acc
1(0) get_connection(): Connection found in the pool
1(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): auth_db
1(0) get_connection(): Connection not found in the pool
2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 5631
2(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): tm
2(0) DEBUG: callid: '4afafbdf-0(a)212.71.0.60'
2(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): nathelper
2(0) rtpp_test: RTP proxy found, support for it enabled
2(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): usrloc
2(0) get_connection(): Connection not found in the pool
2(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): acc
2(0) get_connection(): Connection found in the pool
2(0) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): auth_db
2(0) get_connection(): Connection not found in the pool
Vriendelijke groeten, sincères salutations, best regards
Bart van Daal
Tel + 32 3 780 74 80
www.edpnet.net <http://www.edpnet.net/>
EDPnet Technical Department
----------------------------------------------------------------
EDPnet confidential proprietary business information
Hi,
I have a phone behind nat trying to call someone with
cpl script. The script does the proxy. So cpl module
looks up the location table and forwards the INVITE.
So it doesn't have a chance to call rtpproxy. Is it
possible to call rtpproxy before forwarding the call?
Is it even possible to use cpl with nated clients?
Thanks,
Richard
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Having used both rtpproxy and mediaproxy for quite sometime, here's my bits -
(NOTE - I used rtpproxy a few months back - and a few changes might have occured during these few months - so some of my comments may be inaccurate).
1. When I used rtporoxy a few months back, it would not allow chaining two or more rtpproxies and I had to hack the code to make it work that way. To me this is a very important feature. If you are talking of a telco grade VoIP product, having control over the RTP stream is very very important - legal interception for example (I am sure one day our regulatory bodies or the government will force some requirement on this), prevent terminating SIP session and yet continuing the RTP session, privacy etc. And the only way you can have control over the RTP stream is by forcing it go via your rtpproxy/mediaproxy. So I think rtpproxy/mediaproxy has a purpose beyond the nathelper functionality. Mediaproxy can do that already. I am not sure of what changes have happened since I last used rtpproxy - but if this feature is still missing, it will be great to have this feature included.
2. Loadbalancing is important - particularly if you are thinking of proxing hundreds of calls at any instant. Mediaproxy gives this feature. I would like to see this in rtpproxy.
3. While using rtpproxy, when you terminate a call, SER does not send a message to the rtpproxy to terminate the rtp-stream associated with that call. Rather, rtpproxy sits there waiting and eventually times out. This is not good - there should be a tighter control.
4. rtpproxy is written in C. I like it - maybe because I am a bit more familiar with C. mediaproxy is written in python, and that makes me a bit uncomfortable about performance issues - although I have seen some earlier posting saying that the performance difference isn't much. But I can't say much on this until I do my own testing.
Dhiraj Bhuyan
Network Security Specialist,
BT Exact Business Assurance Solutions
Tel: +44 1473 643932
Mob: +44 7962 012145
Email: dhiraj.2.bhuyan(a)bt.com
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On
Behalf Of Atle Samuelsen
Sent: 23 July 2004 07:21
To: Gustavo Russo
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
Both work :-)
- Atle
* Gustavo Russo <grusso(a)netex.com.ar> [040723 01:15]:
> Arne :
>
> Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
> question, in every case nobody answered.
>
> It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
> mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
> the two.
>
> Regards,
> Gustavo Russo
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com>
> > To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
> > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
> > mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
> >
> > >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
> > have multiple mediaproxies.
> > (sonds good)
> >
> > On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
> > get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
> >
> > I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
> >
> > I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
> > ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
> >
> > What is the most compatible solution at present ?
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Arne.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi again :)
Got one more question about using a mediagateway. Right now I've got
everything configured that SER relays the call to our mediagateway
(asterisk) when necessary. The mediagateway is also on a public IP, but
only accepting UDP port 5060 connections from the SER proxy. (We use RP
(reverse path) filtering on our routers, so the IP address cannot be
spoofed). Come to think of it, I can additionally also filter on MAC
address since both machines are in the same LAN..
I read that a lot of people use an RTP proxy for forwarding the RTP
traffic to the gateway (which in turn is in a private net).
My question is: Is my setup less secure than using the RTP proxy ? If
so, why ?
Thanks !
Regards,
Leon
I have followed the instructions from the radius howto.
and i have radius authentication working.
i've double checked the dictionary.ser files and they are the same as the
sip_router/etc/dictionary.ser
i still get this error.
0(0) ERROR: acc: can't get code for the Sip-Method attribute
0(0) init_mod(): Error while initializing module acc
any other idea's it works fine when i use the mysql accounting. any help
would be appreciated.
Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [SMTP:jan@iptel.org]
> Sent: 23 July 2004 09:47
> To: Sean Lowry
> Cc: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Radius Acc errors.
>
> You have to use the dictionary that comes with ser, see
> sip_router/etc/dictionary.ser
>
> Read the documentation: http://iptel.org/ser/ser_radius.html
>
> Jan.
>
> On 22-07 11:03, Sean Lowry wrote:
> > I have done this but i'm getting another strange error
> >
> >
> > 0(0) ERROR: acc: can't get code for the Sip-Method attribute
> > 0(0) init_mod(): Error while initializing module acc
> > ERROR: error while initializing modules
> >
> >
> > this debug is from ser -ddddd start.
> >
> > any ideas
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [SMTP:daniel@iptel.org]
> > > Sent: 22 July 2004 10:31
> > > To: Sean Lowry
> > > Cc: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Radius Acc errors.
> > >
> > > Have you compiled the acc module with radius support? If no, take a
> look
> > > into Makefile of acc module for documentation about how to do it.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/22/2004 10:27 AM, Sean Lowry wrote:
> > >
> > > >i compiled ser from source so i could add the radius accounting
> features.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_config> not found in
> > > module
> > > ><acc>
> > > > 0(18879) parse error (57,80-81): Can't set module parameter
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <service_type> not found in
> > > module
> > > ><acc>
> > > > 0(18879) parse error (58,35-36): Can't set module parameter
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_flag> not found in
> > > module
> > > ><acc>
> > > > 0(18879) parse error (59,33-34): Can't set module parameter
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc
> > > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_missed_flag> not
> found
> > > in
> > > >module <acc>
> > > > 0(18879) parse error (60,40-41): Can't set module parameter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >does anyone have any idea's
> > > >
> > > >Sean
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Serusers mailing list
> > > >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
