hello friends,
has any body got success using the sip-communicator
with ser
does any body know which codec it uses
does this support in nat traveresal
so please guide me
with regards
serdiehard
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/
hello friends
can any body give me leads in the vocal 's integration
with the ser
with regards
rama kanth
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/
hello friends,
i have standard cvs version rel_0_8_12 of ser.
i have redhat linux 9.0 as server
iam using free radius server authentication
i have even serweb running
now i want to use the voice mail so how can we
achive this
does i need to use the sql authentication with that?
while subscribeing in serweb it asks for username
and phone number my doubt is while trying to call from
any softphone does we need to tyep
username(a)sipdomain.com or username(a)sipdomain.com
with regards
rama kanth
with regards
ser die hard
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
The problem seems to be something to do with sip_registrar sending
messages...
I don't quite understand how mdump() works... because when admin logs
off/logs in.. I see in the log that msilo is trying to send messages to
test1 as well? And of course this user is still offline... surely
mdump() should only send the messages for the user who has just
registered...
Any ideas?
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@iptel.org]
Sent: 22 July 2004 14:10
To: Dave Bath
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] mdump() errors
you may need to filter the messages coming from msilo (ser host) and not
call failure route for those (if src_ip==127.0.0.1 or src_ip==ser_ip
skip failure route).
Daniel
On 7/22/2004 2:51 PM, Dave Bath wrote:
>As a follow up to this, it seems theres some bizarre looping going
>on....
>
>Now that I've had a UA sign on and off a few times, the number of
>messages to offline users in the syslog is increasing exponentially...
>
>If I just start with one message sent from test1-->admin while admin is
>(online-but-doesn't-support-MESSAGE) then I see the message stored
>correctly. If I go to Serweb I see:
>
>sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com today 13:42
>test
>
>correctly.
>
>When admin's UA signs off and back on again, I see the following... in
>serweb
>
>sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com today 13:42
>test
>
>sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com today 13:43
>[Offline message - Thu Jul 22 13:42:58 2004] test
>
>And the following in the error log:
>
>Jul 22 13:43:29 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30426]: MESSAGING: Offline messages
>dumped
>Jul 22 13:43:29 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30431]: MESSAGING: Destination UA
does
>not support MESSAGE requests. Message Stored.
>Jul 22 13:43:29 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30431]: ACC: transaction answered:
>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>o-uri=sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060, call_id=769feac0-30426(a)161.30.94.68,
>from=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54e
d
>-7963, code=202
>Jul 22 13:43:29 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30427]: MESSAGING: Message to offline
>user received -> storing using msilo...
>Jul 22 13:43:30 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30427]: MESSAGING: offline message
NOT
>stored
>Jul 22 13:43:30 sip /usr/sbin/ser[30427]: ACC: transaction answered:
>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>o-uri=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>call_id=769feac1-30431(a)161.30.94.68,
>from=sip:sip_registrar@161.30.94.68;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54e
d
>-c61d, code=503
>
>It seems that mdump() somehow doesn't pick up the fact that admin is
now
>not an offline user, so it generates a new message... any ideas?!
>(*begs*)!
>
>Very best regards,
>
>Dave
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
>Behalf Of Dave Bath
>Sent: 22 July 2004 12:58
>To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: RE: [Serusers] mdump() errors
>
>Ok! Well... adding in the server name to hosts file solved that
>problem.. thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
>
>However... now there's some more weirdness... as you can see, when the
>registration happens, mdump() tries to send all the currently stored
>messages.. but, my failure_route picks it up and enters the next line
>"Destination UA does not support... ". However, I don't understand
what
>happens after that... I don't understand why I then get a "Message to
>offline user received.." - that should only appear when sending to a
>user which doesn't have a current location...
>
>When not using mdump().. i.e. I'm just sending IMs using serweb to (1)
>offline UAs and (2) Unsupported UAs I do not see this problem... only
>the correct entries are in the log.
>
>Perhaps I do not understand the way mdump() works?
>
>Any thoughts gratefully receieved...
>
>D
>
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23423]: MESSAGING: Offline messages
>dumped
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23424]: MESSAGING: Destination UA
does
>not support MESSAGE requests. Message Stored.
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23424]: ACC: transaction answered:
>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>o-uri=sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060, call_id=1bcf7e01-23423(a)161.30.94.68,
>from=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54e
d
>-322f, code=202
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23427]: MESSAGING: Message to offline
>user received -> storing using msilo...
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23427]: MESSAGING: offline message
NOT
>stored
>Jul 22 12:49:40 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23427]: ACC: transaction answered:
>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>o-uri=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>call_id=1bcf7e01-23424(a)161.30.94.68,
>from=sip:sip_registrar@161.30.94.68;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54e
d
>-4a28, code=503
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@iptel.org]
>Sent: 22 July 2004 12:38
>To: Dave Bath
>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] mdump() errors
>
>How is registered sip.dev.inmarsat.com in your DNS? mdupm() tries to
>send messages to <sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com>. Is there an IP
>associated with this domain or a SRV entry for it?
>
>Daniel
>
>On 7/22/2004 1:22 PM, Dave Bath wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hey Daniel,
>>
>>Many thanks for reply. I don't think it is as stated in error
messages
>>- as I have a single machine with a single NIC and single IP. Here
are
>>the network dumps foe the register statement, and corresponding syslog
>>entry.
>>
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23427]: MESSAGING: Offline messages
>>dumped
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23419]: ERROR: udp_send:
>>sendto(sock,0xbd72b0f8,633,0,0xbd72a464,16): Invalid argument(22)
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23419]: CRITICAL: invalid
>>sendtoparameters one possible reason is the server is bound to
>>
>>
>localhost
>
>
>>and attempts to send to the net
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23419]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send
>>failed
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23419]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack:
>>sending request failed
>>Jul 22 12:17:58 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23419]: ACC: transaction answered:
>>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com,
>>o-uri=sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060,
call_id=1bcf7e00-23427(a)161.30.94.68,
>>from=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54
e
>>
>>
>d
>
>
>>-cced, code=477
>>
>>interface: eth0 (161.30.94.64/255.255.255.224)
>>filter: ip and ( port 5060 )
>>match: UDP
>>#
>>U 81.86.136.86:5060 -> 161.30.94.68:5060
>>REGISTER sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>81.86.136.86:50
>>60;rport;branch=z9hG4bKDA365D6C01604EF4ABC2FED4B3AAF541..From: Dave
>>
>>
>Bath
>
>
>><s
>>ip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com>;tag=1598567160..To: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip
>>.dev.inmarsat.com>..Contact: "Dave Bath"
>><sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060>..Cal
>>l-ID: F64F298D25B34CB69E54236E6B62A53B@sip.dev.inmarsat.com..CSeq:
>>
>>
>43904
>
>
>>RE
>>GISTER..Expires: 1800..Max-Forwards: 70..User-Agent: X-Lite release
>>1103m..
>>Content-Length: 0....
>>#
>>U 161.30.94.68:5060 -> 81.86.136.86:5060
>>SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>81.86.136.86:5060;rport=5060;bra
>>nch=z9hG4bKDA365D6C01604EF4ABC2FED4B3AAF541..From: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip
>>.dev.inmarsat.com>;tag=1598567160..To: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsa
>>t.com>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.3ce6..Call-ID:
>>F64F298D25B34CB6
>>9E54236E6B62A53B@sip.dev.inmarsat.com..CSeq: 43904
>>REGISTER..WWW-Authentica
>>te: Digest realm="sip.dev.inmarsat.com",
>>nonce="40ffa3926d16f7926917b380f86
>>83ceb509974df"..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.12
>>(i386/linux))..Content-L
>>ength: 0..Warning: 392 161.30.94.68:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:
>>pid=23430
>>req_src_ip=81.86.136.86 req_src_port=5060
>>in_uri=sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com o
>>ut_uri=sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com via_cnt==1"....
>>#
>>U 81.86.136.86:5060 -> 161.30.94.68:5060
>>REGISTER sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>81.86.136.86:50
>>60;rport;branch=z9hG4bKA3FF9ABFFB7945CBB01DA4A460F991E9..From: Dave
>>
>>
>Bath
>
>
>><s
>>ip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com>;tag=1598567160..To: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip
>>.dev.inmarsat.com>..Contact: "Dave Bath"
>><sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060>..Cal
>>l-ID: F64F298D25B34CB69E54236E6B62A53B@sip.dev.inmarsat.com..CSeq:
>>
>>
>43905
>
>
>>RE
>>GISTER..Expires: 1800..Authorization: Digest
>>username="admin",realm="sip.de
>>v.inmarsat.com",nonce="40ffa3926d16f7926917b380f8683ceb509974df",respo
n
>>
>>
>s
>
>
>>e="
>>96729bb402fed85833dd6e1fb0cb08c9",uri="sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com"..Max-
F
>>
>>
>o
>
>
>>rwa
>>rds: 70..User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m..Content-Length: 0....
>>#
>>U 161.30.94.68:5060 -> 81.86.136.86:5060
>>SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>81.86.136.86:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4b
>>KA3FF9ABFFB7945CBB01DA4A460F991E9..From: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip.dev.inmar
>>sat.com>;tag=1598567160..To: Dave Bath
>><sip:admin@sip.dev.inmarsat.com>;tag
>>=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.29ec..Call-ID:
>>F64F298D25B34CB69E54236E6B
>>62A53B@sip.dev.inmarsat.com..CSeq: 43905 REGISTER..Contact:
>><sip:admin@81.8
>>6.136.86:5060>;q=0.00;expires=1800..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.12
>>(i38
>>6/linux))..Content-Length: 0..Warning: 392 161.30.94.68:5060 "Noisy
>>feedbac
>>k tells: pid=23427 req_src_ip=81.86.136.86 req_src_port=5060
>>in_uri=sip:si
>>p.dev.inmarsat.comout_uri=sip:sip.dev.inmarsat.com via_cnt==1"....
>>###
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@iptel.org]
>>Sent: 22 July 2004 12:01
>>To: Dave Bath
>>Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] mdump() errors
>>
>>The error is related to sendto() function. If it is not the situation
>>shown in the error messages, please send the network dumps including
>>
>>
>the
>
>
>>REGISTER request that triggers the mdump(). The error messages are
>>underlined below.
>>
>>Daniel
>>
>>On 7/22/2004 12:50 PM, Dave Bath wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hey guys,
>>>
>>>Finally have the proper logic in place to cope with offline messages
>>>and messages to UAs that don't support the MESSAGE method... however,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>at
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>the end of the REGISTER block in my ser.cfg I try and call mdump() to
>>>make sure any offline messages are delivered to the UA.... However
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>when
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>registering with a UA which doesn't support MESSAGE method (I haven't
>>>got one which does support it right now..) I get the following:
>>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23423]: MESSAGING: Offline messages
>>>dumped
>>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23418]: ERROR: udp_send:
>>>sendto(sock,0xbd72b0f8,633,0,0xbd72a
>>>
>>>464,16): Invalid argument(22)
>>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23418]: CRITICAL: invalid
>>>sendtoparameters one possible reaso
>>>
>>>n is the server is bound to localhost and attempts to send to the net
>>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23418]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>failed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23418]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack:
>>>sending request failed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jul 22 11:29:20 sip /usr/sbin/ser[23418]: ACC: transaction answered:
>>>method=MESSAGE, i-uri=sip:
>>>
>>>admin(a)sip.dev.inmarsat.com, o-uri=sip:admin@81.86.136.86:5060,
>>>call_id=1bcf7e00-23423(a)161.30.94
>>>
>>>.68,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>from=sip:test1@sip.dev.inmarsat.com;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54
e
>>
>>
>d
>
>
>>-57d2,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>code=477
>>>
>>>Is this perhaps because m_dump() is trying to send it to the UA even
>>>though the UA does not support MESSAGE? If so, is there a way I can
>>>catch it? Does the registration process interrogate the UA as to
which
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>methods it supports? Perhaps if this is the case, I could only do an
>>>m_dump() if the UA supported messages? Or does m_dump() have its own
>>>error handling somewhere?
>>>
>>>Sorry for all the questions!
>>>
>>>NB. I don't get this message when sending an IM to an offline or an
>>>online-but-message-unsupported-UA... only as part of the m_dump in my
>>>register block...
>>>
>>>Many thanks in advance,
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
>>>/-------------------------------------/
>>>
>>>/Dave Bath/
>>>
>>>/dave(a)fuuz.com <mailto:dave@fuuz.com>/
>>>
>>>/www.fuuz.com <http://www.fuuz.com>/
>>>
>>>/07736 232085/
>>>
>>>NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended for the
>>>named recipients only, it may be privileged and confidential. If you
>>>are not the intended recipient, you must not copy distribute or take
>>>any action in reliance upon it. No warranties or assurances are made
>>>in relation to the safety and content of this email and any
>>>attachments. No liability is accepted for any consequences arising
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>from it
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>>>
>>>
>-
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
Hi,
I have installed serweb on apache 2.0.50 and php 4.3.8.
Initially, I had problem while loging in admin page.I was getting bad
user name and password message, whenever I tried to enter with
admin/heslo.Now it is sorted out and working perfectly.
But, now I have problem while opening user_interface/index.php page.I
am trying to loging with admin/heslo. It is not giving any error. It
just stuck to sending request to ....and hang on.
Neighter it is giving and error message nor going anywhere. I just
unable to understand it.
Please help me.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sanjiv
Hi
I have this problem trying to compile ser with mysql support:
make all
.
.
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.1/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [mysql.so] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/root/ser-0.8.12/modules/mysql'
ERROR: module modules/mysql/mysql.so not compiled
...if I try to install mysql.so from rpm "ser-mysql-0.8.12-0.i386.rpm" I have this error:
~# rpm -i ser-mysql-0.8.12-0.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
ser = 0.8.12 is needed by ser-mysql-0.8.12-0
any idea?
Rafael
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.
Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.
Hello all,
Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
>From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to have multiple mediaproxies.
(sonds good)
On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
What is the most compatible solution at present ?
thanks in advance,
Arne.
Hi all,
I have a problem when i enter into IVR and I have the second user come in,
the session of the first user is being cut.
How can IVR take multiple user like conference, which file can I edit to do
so....please help...thanks.....
regards,
shirley
