sr-users May 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

195 participants
503 discussions

[Users] how to build RPM packages
by Klaus Darilion 17 May '06

17 May '06

Hi! I'm used to debian, thus all I ever did was "make deb". But as there are lots of spec files for rpm based distros in packaging/rpm: How do I build RPM packages? Thanks Klaus

2 1

[Users] Help with SER and B2BUA
by Marco Meinardi 17 May '06

17 May '06

Dear Guys, I still need help designing my SER architecture. I have to implement prepaid system with customized billing methods and I have been advised to use Asterisk B2BUA. SER and Asterisk will handle signalling, Mediaproxy will handle ALL RTP streams. UAc ---> SER: Auth, Loc ---> Asterisk B2BUA ---> UAs |_____________________________| Mediaproxy I want to keep SER as my central SIP proxy performing user registration, authentication and location, using Asterisk only for terminating ongoigng calls after the credit is over. An external perl application will calculate the time that the call should last, according to remaning credit, Asterisk will decrement this time counter and terminate the call when it reaches to 0. Subtracting credit will be done in post-processing reading SER acc table. Please advise me, by telling me if this is the correct approach and if it possible to implement. Thanks in advance once again. Regards, -- Marco Meinardi <m.meinardi(a)reteitaly.com> ReteItaly S.r.l. www.reteitaly.com _____________________________________________ C.so Svizzera, 185 - 10149 Torino - Italy Tel. +39 011 7767694 - Mobile +39 335 7878604 Fax +39 011 746179 _____________________________________________

2 1

Fwd: [Serusers] Detecting Lost IAD Registration
by Ali Zaidi 17 May '06

17 May '06

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ali Zaidi <aligzaidi(a)gmail.com> Date: May 17, 2006 11:30 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Detecting Lost IAD Registration To: David <david(a)lolling.org> David, You said this problem is not wide spread and SER is responding well to other UAs, so what i think problem is not with SER, it is UA who is acting weird. Thanks, Ali. On 5/17/06, David <david(a)lolling.org> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. > > We deploy the proxy at the edge of our ICO's networks. > We are using RTP proxying to deal with the NAT issues > and that has been successful. > > This particular company is running IP over their ATM which > we suspect may be the root of the problem but I am at the > very beginning stages of troubleshooting. This is not a wide > spread problem with them and it is one we cannot reproduce > in our lab. > > For now, I am trying to find a way to monitor the proxy at > the ICO to catch lost registrations so I can possible corelate > it with other system events on their network. > > We have seen this problem with Grandstream and Mediatrix IAD's. > > We do not have access to their network internals so we have to > look elsewhere. > > Thanks, > > Dave > > --------- Original Message -------- > From: Ali Zaidi <aligzaidi(a)gmail.com> > To: David <david(a)lolling.org> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Detecting Lost IAD Registration > Date: 17/05/06 10:02 > > > David, > >   > > It is hard to say, unless we know your implementation or layout of your > IP > network. > > Are you using SER with any NAT traversal solution such as RTPProxy or > Mediaproxy? > > Is your UA are behind NAT? > > is anything change since you took charge or UA always loosing > connections > and now you there to fix this existing problem? > > Personally i never see UA looses any registration once > you configure > SER in proper way. Yes, i do have these problems with Asterisk once in a > while. > > Is there any Firewall in midle of UA and SER? > >   > > by the way what is IAD? > >   > > Thanks Ali... > >   > >   > > On 5/17/06, David <david(a)lolling.org> wrote: > > Hello,I am new to using and managing SER server.  Mycompany > has > a large scale implementation of SER > > and we have been having problems with end usersloosing registration on > our > SER server and insome cases the IAD's will not re-register unlessyou > reboot > the IAD.As I am very new to this and have been thrown in > > head first, I thought I would ask on this list.For trouble shooting > purposes, I was wondering ifthere is a way to automatically detect when an > IADlooses registration and then have it fire off anemail? > > Thanks,David_______________________________________________Serusers > mailing listserusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > >

2 2

Fwd: [Serusers] Detecting Lost IAD Registration
by Ali Zaidi 17 May '06

17 May '06

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ali Zaidi <aligzaidi(a)gmail.com> Date: May 17, 2006 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Detecting Lost IAD Registration To: David <david(a)lolling.org> David, It is hard to say, unless we know your implementation or layout of your IP network. Are you using SER with any NAT traversal solution such as RTPProxy or Mediaproxy? Is your UA are behind NAT? is anything change since you took charge or UA always loosing connections and now you there to fix this existing problem? Personally i never see UA looses any registration once you configure SER in proper way. Yes, i do have these problems with Asterisk once in a while. Is there any Firewall in midle of UA and SER? by the way what is IAD? Thanks Ali... On 5/17/06, David <david(a)lolling.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am new to using and managing SER server. My > company has a large scale implementation of SER > and we have been having problems with end users > loosing registration on our SER server and in > some cases the IAD's will not re-register unless > you reboot the IAD. > > As I am very new to this and have been thrown in > head first, I thought I would ask on this list. > > For trouble shooting purposes, I was wondering if > there is a way to automatically detect when an IAD > looses registration and then have it fire off an > email? > > Thanks, > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

Re: [Serusers] serweb : error Undefined class name 'errorhandler' in application_layer/page_co
by Karel Kozlik 17 May '06

17 May '06

Latest tarball is here ftp://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serweb/serweb-0.9.4.tar.gz And RPM package is here: http://yum.sip-router.org/fedora-4/main/binary-i386/serweb-0.9.3-0.i386.rpm but it is for fedora. I do not know if will work in suse... Karel Americania .it napsal(a): > Yes I 've ser 0.9.4 from rpm for Suse and serweb from Berilios but > didn't work (errorhandler non defined ) : so I got serweb from CVS and > mixed it up ! :-( > > Where can I get the last working serweb for ser 0.9.4 (package or tarbal > ) ? > > Thanks > >> From: Karel Kozlik <karel(a)iptel.org> >> To: "Americania .it" <americania(a)hotmail.com> >> CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] serweb : error Undefined class name >> 'errorhandler' in application_layer/page_co >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:33:05 +0200 >> >> where you get the sources? You have to have a mix of new and an old >> files. If you are useing ser 0.9.x you should install serweb-0.9.4 >> from tarbal or package. If you have ser from cvs, try reinstall serweb >> from cvs. >> >> Karel >> >> Americania .it napsal(a): >>> I'm trying to install serweb on Linux Suse 10 with apache2 , php , >>> PEAR , PECL Runkit installed but when I call the page >>> >>> http://host_name/serweb/user/index.php >>> >>> I get the following error : >>> >>> Fatal error: Undefined class name 'errorhandler' in >>> /srv/www/htdocs/serweb/application_layer/page_controler.php on line 102 >>> >>> What can I do ? >>> >>> I've got crazy trying to understand what is wrong ...! >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >

1 0

[Serusers] Call transfer, ser not send BYE after REFER
by Murděj Ukrutný 17 May '06

17 May '06

Hello, i have problem with call transfer. I try A call to B, B receive call, B transfer A to B truncate ngrep port 5060: INVITE B From: A To: B REFER A From: B To: A Refer-To: C Referred-by: B INVITE C From: A To: C Problem: ser not send BYE after REFER My ser.cfg: debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_mode=0666 #mhomed=yes listen=195.137.182.11 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/group.so" #loadmodule "SER_MODULES_DIR/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth", "nonce_expire", 300) modparam("auth", "rpid_prefix", "<sip:") modparam("auth", "rpid_suffix", "@GW_IP_3>;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;screen=yes;privacy=off") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # Acc modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1) modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1) modparam("acc", "db_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "log_fmt", "fisum") # Nemelo by se to objevit v logu #modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLAG_ACC) #modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", FLAG_MISSED) # Nastaveni spojeni k Mysql pro moduly modparam("group|usrloc|uri_db|acc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:ser@localhost/ser") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Do acc se zapisuji vsechny nasledujici pozadavky if (method == "INVITE" || method == "CANCEL" || method == "BYE" || method == "ACK") { setflag(2); }; # Uprava hlavicky Server remove_hf("Server"); append_hf("Server: EMEA Telecom IBM S2 SIP Server\r\n"); # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, the received test should, if completed, should check all vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!(method=="REGISTER")) record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; # account all BYEs if (method=="BYE") setflag(2); }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Kontrola prihlaseni podle tabulky subscribler if (!www_authorize("sip.ahoj.cz", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("sip.ahoj.cz", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { if (does_uri_exist()) { # Existuje na serveru ale neni online sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; } else { # neni na tomto serveru, pujde do pstn, nebude se pouzivat rtpproxy resetflag(6); setflag(1); }; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); append_hf("X-rtpproxy: yes\r\n"); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP route(2); } route[2] { if ((method == "INVITE") && (uri =~ "sip:S302_")) { sl_send_reply("302", "Rewrited"); break; }; if (method == "INVITE") { if (src_ip == "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx") { setflag(4); append_hf("X-s2router-source: gateway-pstn\r\n"); log("LOG: From PSTN\n"); }; if (!is_user_in("Request-URI", "free-pstn")) { if (!isflagset(4) && !proxy_authorize("DIGEST_REALM", "subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("DIGEST_REALM", "0"); break; }; # let's check from=id ... avoids accounting confusion if (!isflagset(4) && !check_from()) { log("LOG: From Cheating attempt\n"); sl_send_reply("403", "That is ugly -- use From=id next time (gw)"); break; }; }; }; # Pokud neni cislo registrovane na serveru zkus pstn if (isflagset(1)) { # Vola jen na cisla if (uri =~ "^[a-zA-Z]+:[0-9]+@") { route(4); } else { sl_send_reply("604", "Does Not Exist Anywhere"); }; break; }; route(3); } route[4] { log(1, "Jedu pres PSTN"); if (!(method == "INVITE" || method == "ACK" || method == "CANCEL" || method == "OPTIONS" || method == "BYE")) { sl_send_reply("500", "only VoIP methods accepted for GW"); break; }; rewritehostport("195.122.201.61:5060"); # Acc setflag(2); route(3); } route[3] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; break; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } Any idea? Thank -- Murdej Ukrutny

1 0

[Users] new major release roadmap
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 May '06

17 May '06

Hello, as you could deduced from last mails, preparation for a new major release started. The problems in the past weeks with the CVS delayed the start. Initial plan was to freeze the CVS last week and go in testing phase (it will be announced very soon, once the all developers will be aware). The target is to release the new version 1.1.0 at mid of June (one year since OpenSER started). We will do the best to stick to that date, although it might be postponed for a bit, if the testing phase does not go smooth. There were a lot of new features and improvements added to the development branch. Delaying a new release will make hard the migration to it. In this testing phase we will integrate most of the patches posted on the tracker, with special care to TLS (thanks to Klaus for his contribution). Also, the modules will be reviewed to be aligned to new syntaxes and internals of the core. Just to list some of the new stuff: - statistics support in core - NAPTR support - direct access to pseudo-variables via avpops - new modules: dialog, osp, path, siptrace, statistics, unixodbc - lot of new features in: avpops, enum, rr, tm, msilo, pdt, nathelper, group, dispatcher, textops ... modules To ease the migration, I have started a dokuwiki page to collect the changes and upgrade steps: http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=migrating_openser_v1.0.x_to_v1.1.x Hope some of you will contribute there. Testing development branch and feedback will be very appreciated. Cheers, Daniel

3 3

RE: [Serusers] Which IM client
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 17 May '06

17 May '06

Hi, Thanks for the reply. I downloaded Windows messenger 5.1 (5.1.0701) from the link you sent. Unfortunately I don't see "SIP Communications Service Account" in the Accounts window. Only 2 options (.NET Passport Account and Exchange Account) What version do you use ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Gould, Aaron [mailto:aaron.gould@ngc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:03 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net); Suraj Kumar; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Which IM client click.... Tools Options Accounts * You should see mid-way down the check box for SIP Communications Service Account. Check that. and type in the sip (aor) name that you want to register into the ser (sip registrar) with. i didn't preceed it with sip: i only typed xyz(a)domain.com * then i clicked "advanced" and checked "configure settings" and put in my hostname of the ser box.....ser.domain.com.......and then checked "udp" that's it ________________________________ From: Ilker Aktuna (Koç.net) [mailto:ilkera@koc.net] Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 7:46 AM To: Gould, Aaron; Suraj Kumar; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Which IM client Thanks. How do you connect to a SIP server with Windows Messenger 5.1 ? It only allows me to connect to Passport. -----Original Message----- From: Gould, Aaron [mailto:aaron.gould@ngc.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:47 PM To: Ilker Aktuna (Koç.net); Suraj Kumar; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Which IM client http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=a8d9eb73-5f8c-4b9a… click the "continue" button ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Ilker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 6:42 AM To: Suraj Kumar; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Which IM client Hi, Where can I find Windows Messenger 5.1 ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Kumar Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:32 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] Which IM client Hi, a) Can any one suggest a free IM client that I can use to test SIP+SIMPLE using the ser + presence ? I tried with windows messenger 5.1, but it does not seems to be working with the ser + presence server configuration that I used the latest snap shot (ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4.1_src.tar.gz). b) Also, can any one suggest a working sample config for presence (without using the database)? Any suggestions on this is highly appreciated. Regards, Suraj <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020E0406/04034E0F/07064F01/916…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] Can't log the Invite
by AR. 17 May '06

17 May '06

Dear all My ser+freeradius system does not log the INVITE message , I tried to listen the port 1813 that is radius accounting port, but there is no packet come here , when i call to someone. When i terminated the call , the BYE packet will come. Please help me to solve this promble See below for the ser.cfg . . . modparam("acc","log_level",1) modparam("acc","log_flag",1) modparam("acc","log_missed_flag",2) modparam("acc","failed_transactions",1) modparam("acc","report_ack",0) modparam("acc","report_cancels",1) modparam("acc", "radius_config", "/usr/local/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf") modparam("acc","radius_flag",1) modparam("acc","radius_missed_flag",2) . . . if (method=="INVITE" || method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") setflag(1); . . . AR.

1 0

[Serusers] serweb CTD and IM problem! Heeeelp!
by Andrey Kouprianov 17 May '06

17 May '06

Hi, I posting for the fourth time on the row!!!! Can ANYONE answer me please! I have installed serweb 0.9.4, ser 0.9.6, php4 with all the supports needed, pear with DB support, apache 1.3, mysql 1.3.34. Did i miss anything? Oh, pear Log is also installed. Everything is working fine EXCEPT that i cannot send IM from serweb as well as I cannot CTD from serweb. They both reply with "503 Service Unavlailable" or sometimes its 408 Timeout. There's no documentation or threads in the mailing list on this topic, so i cannot look up what is wrong. All available documentation is obsolete. SIP clients I use are eyeBeams, so they both support REFER and MESSAGE methods. Here's /var/log/message log after trying to CTD (both clients are registered!): May 17 16:06:35 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284be0d0,546,0,0x284bd4f8,16): Host is down(64) May 17 16:06:35 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 17 16:06:35 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) Here's /var/log/message log after trying to IM: May 17 16:09:52 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284be0d0,462,0,0x284bd4f8,16): Host is down(64) May 17 16:09:52 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 17 16:09:52 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[47471]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) I set log level for serweb to PEAR_LOG_DEBUG and among some normal trace stuff i can see something like this May 17 16:13:20 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 17 16:13:20 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. ( Is there something I forgot to set or is it just normal? I suppose it's ok, if it's "using default"...) ngrep trace show some empty messages from my eyeBeam to SER and backwards. That's all. I've been stuck with this for 4-5 days already and I REALLY need to get it done asap. Someone... anyone... please, suggest something. Best regards, Andrey.

2 2

← Newer
1
...
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2006