sr-users May 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

195 participants
502 discussions

by Stephen Helfen

I have several sip proxies running ser in the same network. The most recent proxy I have brought up is not authenticating requests, but rather forwarding them off to another proxy in the nextwork. The new proxy is essentially doing nothing more than passing messages back and forth between the UA and the other proxy when it should be able to handle the call itself. Any idea what I could be missing here?

18 years, 2 months

RE: [Serusers] ser.cfg children=

by Gould, Aaron

thanks evan. could i do this ...? 'listen=tls:eth0' thanks aaron ________________________________ From: Evan Borgström [mailto:evan.borgstrom@ca.mci.com] Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 12:51 PM To: Gould, Aaron Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= There are plenty of legitimate uses for having SER listen on a loopback address. I have one server that runs two instances of SER, one for SIP messaging and the other as a SIMPLE<->XMPP (jabber) gateway. They communicate over the loopback interface. To turn off different interfaces just modify your listen statements. For instance if you only want things to listen on eth0 add 'listen=eth0' to your global statements. If you want just UDP on eth0 use 'listen=udp:eth0'. FWIW, a good rule of thumb is to run services blacklist centric (ie. deny everything by default and then allow only the things you want) so the more specific your listen statements are the easier it is to anticipate the traffic you will receive. -Evan Gould, Aaron wrote: > why is there 4 of each? is there a legitimate need for the loopbacks? also, may i turn off the 4 udp and leave only the 4 tcp? if so how please. and furthermore, i beleive tls is security over tcp , if so, how may i turn on tls ? > > thanks > aaron > > > ________________________________ > > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Andrey Kouprianov > Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 3:36 AM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= > > > > There was a privious post on this exactly like yours. Anyway... > > "children=4" mean that there will be 4 UDP, 4 TCP and 4 loopback > listenters on your SER, when you start it (you can check with "serctl > ps" to verify). > > On 5/9/06, Giuseppe Parlato <gparlato(a)tnet.it> wrote: >> Hi >> in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many >> configurations file but there is no explenation >> >> Giuseppe >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

18 years, 2 months

Re: [Users] ACK is sent before the re-INVITE to OpenSER, but

by Gene Willingham

I too am having this problem. Are the reinvites being generated by Asterisk? I have a test environment where making adding two lines of code to asterisk will help the issue. My only concern is whether the code change creates a performance issue. I tried asking the question the asterisk-dev list, but did not get a response. My solution was to insert a usleep(20000) between the ack and the reinvite. This delays the reinvite by 20 ms. The concern I had was is Asterisk fully threaded or does the 20 ms delay delay all processing of sip requests. Gene

18 years, 2 months

[Users] openser on host without public IP

by j.obi＠troja.net

Hi Is it possible to use openser on a host without a public IP address? I have a router by my internet provider for the SDSL connection and behind that a wrt54g with openwrt on it. That works as Firewall and I want to use it as sip proxy now too. My Question is now, are there any possibilities to use openser with stun or something similiar to work around the problem with the IP address? Bye Jens

18 years, 2 months

RE: [Serusers] ser.cfg children=

by Gould, Aaron

why is there 4 of each? is there a legitimate need for the loopbacks? also, may i turn off the 4 udp and leave only the 4 tcp? if so how please. and furthermore, i beleive tls is security over tcp , if so, how may i turn on tls ? thanks aaron ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Andrey Kouprianov Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 3:36 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= There was a privious post on this exactly like yours. Anyway... "children=4" mean that there will be 4 UDP, 4 TCP and 4 loopback listenters on your SER, when you start it (you can check with "serctl ps" to verify). On 5/9/06, Giuseppe Parlato <gparlato(a)tnet.it> wrote: > > Hi > in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many > configurations file but there is no explenation > > Giuseppe > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Q:About:Accounting

by Alejandro Sanchez

Hello, Thank you ever so much, your suggestions really worked!. The error not longer is displayed however the accounting information is not being shown yet, it displays the message: No calls. The DB does have information about accounting of users. Thus we had habilitated the log option, we did some debuging and found that the reason why it is not displaying any information is because the sql query (in method.get_acc_entires.php) does not match with the information in the DB, especificaly in the where section of sql query the domain field doesn't match. The application is expecting to find in domain field of the "acc table" the IP where SER is running but the DB has in domain field the IP of the caller. Why SER is storing the IP of the caller's PC in the domain field? is this correct? if so, why the query is expecting the SER IP in that field instead? How can we fix this? Thank you in advance Best regards, Alex ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y <b >2GB</b> extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx

18 years, 2 months

[Users] 408 error

by unplug

In what case the server will issue 408 error. An user can make call without problem. He also can receive call but the call will be dropped automatically around 50 seconds. From the log below, a 408 request timeout (line682) is created and then the call is dropped. http://fisher.no-ip.com/ngrep/ngrep6667871.log >From the document, the server will create 408 when it can't produce a response before a given time out. But in this case, I don't know why it creates such error only for this user and not for other user. Could anyone can tell me why the server create such error message? Thanks!

18 years, 2 months

[Users] Help in Freeradius and openser

by raviprakash sunkara

Hi to all, I tried to insert the users for testing the server, but small error arrived. That is . a) radiusd.conf[1840] unknown Auth-Type "digest" in authenticate section. b) radclient: Failed to send packet for ID 162: Unknown attribute "NAS-IP-Address" c) radtest test test 192.168.2.55 1812 radiustest Sending Access-Request of id 215 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" User-Password = "test" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Re-sending Access-Request of id 215 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" User-Password = "test" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Please help me in a,b and c issues. what are these issues. Please help me -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

18 years, 2 months

[Users] NEW MODULE : dialog support

by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi, the devel version includes a new module for providing dialog support. For more about it, please see: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/dialog.html Currently the module offers only call tracking functionality. In the future, new functionalities as dialog termination, per dialog flags and AVPs will be added. These will make possible implementation of more complex dialog-based features (like location hiding). regards, bogdan

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] No Voice Link between PBX..PLz help

by fay butt

Hi, I am new user in SER, i am stuck on one problem. When I make a call from a Client connected with SER to Asterisk(PBX) client, it works fine. But,when i make's a call between 2 different PBX ,it rings and connects but there is no voice between these two PBX clients.. In SER.cfg,I am just forwarding the call)..If anybody have idea,how to solve it, Plz helppppppppppppppp me.. if (!lookup("location")) { if (!src_ip==10.19.200.81) { if (uri =~"^sip:4[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.73 , 5060 ); break; } } else if (uri =~"^sip:2[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.84 , 5060 ); break; } else { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; }; Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.

18 years, 2 months

← Newer
1
...
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2006