sr-users May 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

195 participants
503 discussions

[Serusers] No Voice Link between PBX..PLz help
by fay butt 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, I am new user in SER, i am stuck on one problem. When I make a call from a Client connected with SER to Asterisk(PBX) client, it works fine. But,when i make's a call between 2 different PBX ,it rings and connects but there is no voice between these two PBX clients.. In SER.cfg,I am just forwarding the call)..If anybody have idea,how to solve it, Plz helppppppppppppppp me.. if (!lookup("location")) { if (!src_ip==10.19.200.81) { if (uri =~"^sip:4[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.73 , 5060 ); break; } } else if (uri =~"^sip:2[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.84 , 5060 ); break; } else { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; }; Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, Thanks for your reply. Dump is catched on the same machine that runs SER. If no response is seen on the tcpdump trace than the packet is not created or sent (I guess) But I don't have any idea why... Btw, I installed Ser again from CVS and setup 2 new accounts. Then tried to add the accounts to the contact list of eachother (again) No authorization message is received by the other client. I still get the same error messages in Ser log. I am using Fedora 5 linux, if that helps. I believe there is a problem with xcap authorization (or sending the watcherinfo notification). Also , I really suspect my SER configuration. Could you have a look at it if I send it to you ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Vaclav Kubart Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:54 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, my response was this (sent to serusers mailing list): I don't see any responses to presence messages (SUBSCRIBE, PUBLISH) in the ngrep dump but in the log they are. Does this mean, that the dump is catched on another machine than the log? Vaclav On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:37:03PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > My intension is not to disturb you, but I didn't receive a reply from you for the following email. > Di you receive it ? > > Have a nice day, > ilker > > > ________________________________ > > From: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:20 PM > To: 'Vaclav Kubart' > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Hi Vaclav, > > I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. > You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. > In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. > > Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. > Presentity is not shown also. > > Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). > > Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi, > run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: > > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: > next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, > 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 > 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) > called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns > address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 > 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May > 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing > frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) > > In this sample is next_hop = > sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. > > The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). > > The index file is not needed. > > And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) > > Vaclav > > > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 > > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: > > Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify > > returned > > -7 > > > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached > > > ngrep2.out > > > file) > > > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > > > It seems so. > > > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it > > > > be because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address > > > > ?) > > > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/030A0701/07004E0D/090B4C > 06/90204252.jpg> > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor > olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0B0A0505/0D044507/09034E02/282…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 2

[Serusers] Serweb mail problem
by Gokay Tosunoglu 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi all, In my freebsd 6.0 system, serweb registration page does not send mail and returns error. I can send mail manually by terminal, no problem with it. How can i see a log file or something like that to see why it happens? Or any idea for solution? Thanks, Gokay

1 0

[Serusers] SER, Eyebeam, and Via header
by Alistair Cunningham 09 May '06

09 May '06

On SER 0.9.6, we get the following logged when a user with an X-Ten Eyebeam softphone tries to register (IP addresses have been changed): May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via: invalid via - end of header in state 6 May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via on: <SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:46230;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0a622369247b7c31- > ntent-Length: 0am AudioOnly release 3014w stamp 26704, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via parse error, parsed so far:<SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:46230;branch=z9hG4bK-d > 43-0a622369247b7c31-1--d87543-; May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad via > ntent-Length: 0am AudioOnly release 3014w stamp 26704, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO7543-;P/2.0 May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed An ngrep trace shows: Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:35955;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-2667f342e0038805-1--d87543-;. Has anyone seen this before? Is there a change for either SER or Eyebeam to make them work together? -- Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, +44 (0)7870 699 479 http://integrics.com/

2 2

[Serusers] Failed to mount...
by fay butt 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi everyone, I have problem in mounting, I get this messege but i am unable to understand,what is the meaning of mounting. Can anybody help me solving this problem. May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10353]: failed to mount /misc/.directory May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: >> /usr/sbin/showmount: can't get address for .directory May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: lookup(program): lookup for .directory failed May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: failed to mount /net/.directory Thanks in advance, Faisal --------------------------------- Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

1 0

[Serusers] postgres
by Mário Ferreira 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, I have a problem when i try to setup the postgres for the ser: register_udomain(): Invalid table version I checked out from cvs and the database creation script for postgres didn't have the INSERTs for table version. Another checkout I made maybe 3 weeks ago, contained these INSERTs but the same error ocurred. What is missing to use postgres with the cvs version? Regards, Mário Ferreira

1 0

[Serusers] ser.cfg children=
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many configurations file but there is no explenation Giuseppe

2 1

[Users] logging voip calls
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

is it possible to check how long was a VoIP call, directly through ser or some ser tool? thanks Giuseppe

4 3

[Serusers] append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

I get the following error sometimes.. May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: ERROR: append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: lookup(): Error while appending a branch I read it was because the destination set has to be increased. I have to check configur.h file but where is it? I can't find it. I only found in ser.cfg childre=4 Giuseppe

2 3

[Serusers] checking how long a voip call was
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

is it possible to check how long was a VoIP call, through ser or some ser tool? I have a custiomer he thinks the call he made was shorter then the one I billed thanks Giuseppe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2006