sr-users May 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

84 participants
141 discussions

pua_dialoginfo - publish for caller or callee
by Charles Chance 12 May '12

12 May '12

Hi, Quick question relating to pua_dialoginfo (3.2) - is there a way to specify for which side (caller/callee) a PUBLISH is generated, or must it always be for both? Cheers, Charles

1 0

change/replace anything in body message
by Konstantin M. 12 May '12

12 May '12

Hi, Is there a way to change/replace anything in body message ? Used: replace_body_atonce, replace_body_all, replace_all, subst_body. Nothing is working. Thanks,

2 2

(no subject)
by Albert Petit 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hello, On a Kamailio deployment it seems some users get to a wrong state and permanently keeping in: CS_DIRTY Expires==0 for some long times (even half an hour). When they're in this status seems system cannot reach them. Normally , when working on USRLoc mode 2 if the registration expires usually what I observed is that it just not appears on 'kamctl ul show' The affected users are seen like this: AOR:: blue4 Contact:: sip:Blue4@192.168.101.6:5700 Q= Expires:: deleted Callid:: efc560dc2dbd248d4d1f9d39633773df Cseq:: 49995 User-agent:: PoC-client/OMA1.0 Genaker_X-Platform_IMS_SDK/v2.0 State:: CS_DIRTY Flags:: 0 Cflag:: 0 Socket:: udp:10.133.21.141:6666 Methods:: 8143 The refresh from the clients seem to come intime however some users (and not all) got to this CS_DIRTY state instead of being removed or refreshed. The client refresh looks to arrive in-time so it should be refreshed. Which could be a common cause (misconfiguration?) for this type of problem? If not, could enable debug mode for usrloc or I need to enable for full kamailio? Thanks Albert

1 0

Kamailio ignores some ACK
by Efelin Novak 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hi folks, I have a strange problem when Kamailio ignores ACKs in a specific scenario. The call flow is as follows: A -> INVITE -> kamailio -> INVITE -> B [omitting 100 and 180] A <- 200 OK <- kamailio <- 200 OK <- B A -> ACK -> kamailio There are INVITE Xlogs, Reply ROUTE xlogs and media-proxy logs in the syslog. However there is no information about these ACKs. No XLOGs are printed even if there is one on the top of the main route. "tcpdump -A -s0 -i any -n port 5060" receives this message correctly: 14:47:01.246153 IP 111.111.11.11.5060 > 80.80.80.80.60442: SIP, length: 915 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.111.11.11:5060;rport=60442;x-route-tag="tgrp:A";branch=z9hG4bK1634E6A88 Record-Route: <sip:111.111.11.11;lr;ftag=599248D4-260;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW0FVT0ZWHF1aNy4xGzA-;nat=yes;did=3bb.327c47e6> Contact: <sip:80.80.80.80:65002;transport=udp> To: "test_account"<sip:bob@server.com>;tag=cb7dd641 From: <sip:alice@111.111.11.50>;tag=599248D4-260 Call-ID: 9AFCFC51.11.50 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length:263 v=0 o=- 492575093 492575093 IN IP4 111.111.11.60 s=test_device i=(o=IN IP4 192.168.1.10) c=IN IP4 111.111.11.71 t=0 0 m=audio 16416 RTP/AVP 18 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 14:47:01.254511 IP 111.111.11.50.60442 > 111.111.11.11.5060: SIP, length: 521 ACK sip:80.80.80.80:65002;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.111.11.50:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:A";branch=z9hG4bK1634E7DE8 From: <sip:alice@111.111.11.50>;tag=599248D4-260 To: "test_account"<sip:bob@server.com>;tag=cb7dd641 Call-ID: 9AFCFC51.11.50 Route: <sip:111.111.11.11;lr;ftag=599248D4-260;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW0FVT0ZWHF1aNy4xGzA-;nat=yes;did=3bb.327c47e6> Max-Forwards: 70 CSeq: 101 ACK Content-Length: 0 My Kamailio version is kamailio 3.1.0 (i386/linux) 1e204f. Does anybody knows where can be a problem? How can I check whether Kamailio receives something? ... Jan

5 6

error searching pvar "sp."
by Konstantin M. 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hello, When I have the following code: xlog("Dropped INVITE from unregistered location: $si:$sp.\n"); -- I'm getting a parse error: 0(3735) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:708]: error searching pvar "sp." 0(3735) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:912]: wrong char [./46] in [$sp. ] at [3 (0)] 0(3735) ERROR: xlog [xlog.c:314]: wrong format[Dropped INVITE from unregistered location: $si:$sp. ] When I changed to (removed a point after $sp): xlog("Dropped INVITE from unregistered location: $si:$sp\n"); -- No errors. What I'm doing wrong ? Or it's a parser bug ? Thanks!

2 1

t_continue usage
by Vineet Menon 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hi, the module doc page http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules_k/tmx.html#id2525893says t_continue() has 3rd parameter which says which route block to execute. SO does that mean t_continue() should be present before routing logic(s)?? Where should be t_continue() be placed in a config?? Regards, Vineet Menon

2 1

Community dinner: Barcelona June 13th
by Olle E. Johansson 10 May '12

10 May '12

Hello! I will be running an Asterisk SIP Masterclass - the last one - in Barcelona in June. During this week, I will organize a dinner for everyone working with or interested in Asterisk, Kamailio and other Open Source platforms for realtime communication. It's Wednesday, June 13th somewhere in Barcelona - location will be announced later. You pay our own dinner (unless we can find sponsors) and enjoy the geeky company for free! To join the event, use this Facebook event https://www.facebook.com/events/307548349321608/ See you in Barcelona! /O ------ http://edvina.net - Open Unified Communication - training, consulting, workshops

1 0

kamailio - mysql master-slave connection question
by Uri Shacked 10 May '12

10 May '12

Hi, In my system configuration, i use 2 DB servers. One will be the master and the other is the slave. In kamailio cfg, I set the mysql server as a host name (not ip). On my DNS server the ip behind the name is the master`s address. I wonder, if I stop the mysqld on the master, and change the ip address in the DNS to the slave`s address. Than i do "kamctl dispatcher reload"... Will kamailio go to the DNS, find the address and connect to the slave? BR, Uri

1 0

[SIREMIS] Multiple kamailio management commands
by SamyGo 10 May '12

10 May '12

Hello list, I'm trying to have my Siremis interface send MI commands to multiple kamailio servers i.e reload dispatcher of all the kamailio servers when I reload from Siremis interface. The issue Im facing is that the commands dont get executed on any other server except localhost/ as mentioned in URL: http://kb.asipto.com/siremis:install32x:mi-commands I've edited the <Remote name="remote" address="127.0.0.1" port="8033"/> to : <Remote name="remote" address="192.168.2.156" port="8033"/> Please guide on how to have multiple kamailio receive command from single Siremis interface. Regards, Sammy.

2 8

Re: [SR-Users] Bug: Pua_reginfo
by Gnaneshwar Gatla 10 May '12

10 May '12

Hello, I have noticed that user records were not being correctly saved in the location table. I have tried to fix this will the attached code. This would fix reginfo_handle_notify() to store the user-record in the right format. This fixes part of the problem, I'm still trying to fix the incorrect uri in the PUBLISH message generated by this module. Regards, Gnaneshwar Gatla | InTouch Health | Software Developer 6330 Hollister Ave. Goleta CA, 93117 | P: 805.562.8686 ext: 199 From: Gnaneshwar Gatla Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:58 PM To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Carsten Bock (carsten(a)ng-voice.com) Subject: Bug: Pua_reginfo Hello all, There seems to be an deadlock between registrar and pua_reginfo module whenever a SIP client refreshes its registration. 1. The pua_reginfo does not publish Event:reg when a sip client registers for the first time. 2. The pua_reginfo module does not use ul.lock_udomain() to lock the ul table to get the record. 3. The pua_reginfo does not release the record that it accessed from ul.get_urecord() Since the record is not released, when the client re-registers, the registrar module is unable to query for the userlocation and sends a 200 OK response with 0 bindings. Which leads to no contact header in the response message and eventually deletion of the record in the location table(expires). I have tried to fix this using lock_udomain, release_urecord and unlock_udomain, but failed to rectify the error. The deadlock happens in modules_k/usrloc/udomain.c (db_load_urecord()). if (ul_dbf.query(_c, keys, 0, vals, columns, (use_domain)?2:1, 13, order, &res) < 0) My Question: 1. is pua_reginfo supposed to delete record from location database and send the same data to a presence server? a. If above is true, then should the registrar module insert a new record in the location table? b. If above is false, the registrar module should be able to refresh/update the record in the location table. This error is also impacts pua_usrloc module too as it cannot access the record and sends creates an incorrect uri. Help: I'm new and learning how Kamailio works, is there a clean way that pua_reginfo module gets the record? Gnaneshwar Gatla | InTouch Health | Software Developer 6330 Hollister Ave. Goleta CA, 93117 | P: 805.562.8686 ext: 199

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2012