sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37517 discussions

Kamilio+asterisk = deregister after 2-3 minute
by Mihai 15 Dec '20

15 Dec '20

Hi, I am forwarding all the traffic to my asterisk server ( including registers) everything seems to work when i first register but if stay idle 2-3 minute it gets unregistered and then i can't register back unless i restart kamailio see attached print screen

6 6

voltdb support
by Ali Taher 14 Dec '20

14 Dec '20

Hello, I just need to know if kamailio can communicate with Voltdb for sqlops operations for example. Regards, Ali Taher

2 8

Kamailio v5.4.3 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Dec '20

14 Dec '20

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.4.3 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.4, that includes fixes since the release of v5.4.2. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.4.x. Deployments running previous v5.4.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.4.3. For more details about version 5.4.3 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2020/12/kamailio-v5-4-3-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

Wrong To tag in t_reply
by Ivan Ribakov 14 Dec '20

14 Dec '20

Hi all, I’m trying to implement following routing behaviour: - ingress INVITE is sequentially forked to 1 or more endpoints - under certain conditions sequential forking may be stopped and pre-defined error returned to the caller Here’s is part of the config responsible for handling errors: failure_route[ROUTE_ELEMENT_FINAL_FAILURE_HELPER] { route(ROUTE_ELEMENT_FINAL_FAILURE); } route[ROUTE_ELEMENT_FINAL_FAILURE] { # We need to check if the error happens before the first egress, because T-state is not defined yet so we can not use t_reply if ($var(before_first_egress) == 0) { t_reply("$var(sipCode)", "$var(sipMessage)"); } else { sl_send_reply("$var(sipCode)", "$var(sipMessage)"); } } Here is a simple scenario where delivering call to first endpoint times out after receiving 180 Ringing (using custom fr_inv_timer value) where: - .33 is caller - .208 is Kamailio - .138 is callee Notice that 504 is retransmitted by Kamailio. Here is a comparison of 180 and 504 returned by Kamailio: As can be seen, 180 was proxied from the callee and has callee’s to-tag (tag=CALLEE1), however 504 that was generated by Kamailio using t_reply() has a different to-tag (presumably generated by Kamailio). How can I tell Kamailio not to generate new to-tag but to use the last one that proxied back to the caller? Thanks in advance for any help! Regards, Ivan

2 2

Releasing Kamailio v5.4.3
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Dec '20

14 Dec '20

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.4.3 sometime next week, likely on Monday, December 14, 2020. This is the usual heads up notification to see if anyone is aware of issues not yet reported to bug tracker and if yes, do it as soon as possible to give them a chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

1 1

how to use environment variables to set listen address
by Syed Shahryar 13 Dec '20

13 Dec '20

This is a generic question about using environment variables in a config file. If I want to use below where TLS_IP itself is a constant defined somewhere else. TLS_IP might be set via an env variable as well. #!define TLS_TO_LISTEN tls:TLS_IP:$env(TLS_PORT) Will that work? I see syntax errors and other weird issues. What's the right syntax? -- -- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender, therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version.

2 1

DMQ using Consul
by Syed Shahryar 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

Can someone share their configuration file explaining how they used consul to achieve high availability? -- -- This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender, therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version.

2 1

empty body on first NOTIFY on REGINFO subscription - bug ?
by Adrian Tabacioiu 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

Hello, If the user never registered (or few hours passed from its unregister) the subscription to REGINFO will return an empty body NOTIFY (no xml). I don't see any flag in module to force a body for this case, as in the presence module is force_dummy_presence who can force a body on a first NOTIFY. The RFC3680 says : o Notifications triggered from a SUBSCRIBE contain full state (the list of all contacts bound to the address-of-record). It appears that in this case the response is not conform to RFC. Regards, Adrian

1 0

porting keepalive module new functions on 5.4 on 5.3?
by Benoit Chesneau 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

2 new functions have been added to the keepalive module: - [ka_add_destination(sip_uri, owner)](https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/keepalive.html#keep…) - [ka_del_destination(sip_uri, owner)](https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/keepalive.html#keep…) Is there any possibility to do the same on 5.3? It seems that on 5.3 adding a destination can only be done statically: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/keepalive.html#idm53 or can it also be done dynamically when receiving an event using the kazoo module for example? Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia — t. +33608655490 Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

2 1

Dispatcher algorithm 11 possible priority drifting
by Володимир Іванець 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hello all! We are running Kamailio version 5.3.3 with 16 small Asterisk servers. Kamailio uses a dispatcher module to distribute calls. Algorithm #11 is selected. All destinations are configured with priority set to 50 and attribute to rweight=50. We noticed that one server constantly receives more calls than others. I run a few tests. I was sending 1000 calls to the system. 4 per second. All servers except one were getting around 60 calls while the last one - around 100. I then noticed that the server which receives most calls is always last in the "kamcmd dispatcher.list" command output. I then changed the order in the dispatcher DB table and repeat the test. The other server that now was last was getting the most calls. Does anyone else use algorithm #11 and finds the same thing? Is there something additional that I can provide to help with the investigation? Thanks!

3 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users