5 Dec
2005
5 Dec
'05
4:56 p.m.
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 .
Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in case the
softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request:
0(11348) method: <REGISTER>
0(11348) uri: <sip:192.168.1.100>
0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(11348) After parse_msg...
0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090]
0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090>
]
0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(11348) found end of header
0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100] ==
[192.168.1.100]
0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
0(11348) check_self: host != me
0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffff
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0)
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
0(11348) SER: new transaction fwd'ed
0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
5 Dec
5 Dec
5:03 p.m.
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate
from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can
change it in the phone's settings...
Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar <vids_cs(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 .
Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in
case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request:
0(11348) method: <REGISTER>
0(11348) uri: <sip:192.168.1.100>
0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(11348) After parse_msg...
0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param:
tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090]
0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090>
]
0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(11348) found end of header
0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100] ==
[192.168.1.100]
0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
0(11348) check_self: host != me
0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0)
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed
0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
________________________________
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
10 Dec
10 Dec
3:48 p.m.
Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for
default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the
following:
ser_IP_address:port_number
127.0.0.1:5090
Jose Simoes
p.s. this works with X-Lite
On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate
from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can
change it in the phone's settings...
Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar <vids_cs(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 .
Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but
in
case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request:
0(11348) method: <REGISTER>
0(11348) uri: <sip:192.168.1.100>
0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(11348) After parse_msg...
0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param:
tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090]
0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090>
]
0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(11348) found end of header
0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100]
==
[192.168.1.100]
0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
0(11348) check_self: host != me
0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0)
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed
0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
________________________________
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
14 Dec
14 Dec
12:13 a.m.
Hi Jose.
I tried your way but I did not get it registred. I used many ports but
couldn't get it registred.
I am not using any authentication and when using port 5060 the softphone
registres OK.
My SER and my softphone (X- lite) are on the same network.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Juan Ferrari
United World Telecom
_____
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Voipers Portugal
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 8:48 AM
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Changing Sip Port
Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for
default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the
following:
ser_IP_address:port_number
127.0.0.1:5090
Jose Simoes
p.s. this works with X-Lite
On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate
from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can
change it in the phone's settings...
Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
On 12/5/05, sagar <vids_cs(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
Currently softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060 .
Is it possibe to use any other port like 5090 or 8069
I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfg but in
case the softphone is not getting register.
Here is the ser log
0(11348) SIP Request:
0(11348) method: <REGISTER>
0(11348) uri: <sip: 192.168.1.100>
0(11348) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(11348) After parse_msg...
0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards header
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param:
tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
uri=[sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090]
0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416@192.168.1.100:5090>
]
0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(11348) found end of header
0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [192.168.1.100]
==
[192.168.1.100 <http://192.168.1.100> ]
0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
0(11348) check_self: host != me
0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0)
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed
0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
Please advise.
Thanks In Advance.
________________________________
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
6920
days inactive
6928
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andrey Kouprianov -
Juan -
sagar -
Voipers Portugal