Hello, hash size does not set any limitation to the number of dialogs (active calls), it has impact on searching the dialogs, so if you have a lot of active calls, increasing the hash size might improve performances. Effectively the hash size is used to compute the number of slots (aka buckets) the hash table is going to have, see more technical details about hash tables at: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table Can you elaborate on your statement: creating hundreds of dialogs Do you mean you are not able to create as many dialogs as you want? Cheers, Daniel On 01.12.17 19:54, Mark Blackford wrote: Hello, I am trying to properly size the use of the Dialog Module hash for our implementation using: modparam("dialog", "hash_size", <number that is power of two>) However, in my testing, I have been unable to figure out the relationship between the hash size and a number of dialogs I need to support. I think the hash size is specifying a memory block in kB, but even setting the hash size to a very tiny number does stop me from creating hundreds of dialogs. Is there a way to determine a relationship between the hash size and a rough number of dialogs that would be expected? An example of a a dialog looks like this from kamctl: [root@kamailio01 ~]# kamctl dialog show dialog memory records dialog:: hash=22:70 state:: 4 ref_count:: 2 timestart:: 1512151205 timeout:: 36083666 callid:: 0gQAAC8WAAACBAAALxYAAClws2wyL8GE+CSgRY7HIhmg9ZUIISZad46ntOPng3i PIcLaxzLFaytRTI7M0Bzz0g--(a)10.155.8.40 from_uri:: sip:b53667d44239457fbc94fc2f4c4e25a6@sip.dcs-staging.net from_tag:: 10.155.8.40+1+689d7e5e+8fcf481a caller_contact:: sip:43f0ae1480846185e8803f21e9f2b7 21@10.155.8.40:5060;transport=udp caller_cseq:: 24115 caller_route_set:: caller_bind_addr:: udp:10.155.8.11:5060 callee_bind_addr:: udp:10.155.8.11:5060 to_uri:: sip:2052773090@sip.dcs-staging.net to_tag:: sip+1+bdcd0004+2038f37c callee_contact:: sip:ca2013e84f10348a1cc825c12562bd e7@10.155.8.40:5060;transport=udp callee_cseq:: 0 callee_route_set:: Thanks! -- Mark Blackford Digium Cloud Services 678.230.8769 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

The hash_size has no relevance on how many dialogs can be handled. It is only related to the lookup performance. So even with hash_size=1 you can have same number of dialogs as with hash_size=4096 or higher. The difference is that with hash_size=1, all the dialogs are in a single linked list, so if you have 2000 active dialog, you may have the worse case that it requires 2000 matching operations to lookup a specific dialog. If the hash_size is 2048, the at 2000 active calls and a fair distribution, then looking up a specific dialog will be done in a single matching operation. Fair distribution cannot be ensure, but it is quite good, so typically the difference between the list loaded slot and most loaded slot is not that high. I expect that worse case situation won't require more that 5 matching operations on a hash table with 2048 slots when having 2000 active calls. To put limit on active calls, the simplest solution is to do a test on $stat(active_dialogs)>=limit then reject the initial invite: - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog. html#idp34022668 You may need statistics module to get the $stat(...) var: - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/statistics.html The alternative would be to set all active calls in a single dialog profile. - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog. html#dialog.f.set_dlg_profile Then get the size of the profile and test it against the limit. This is more suitable if you want to set limits per user, a.s.o., because you can group on profiles with a specific key (e.g., username). Cheers, Daniel On 04.12.17 19:28, Mark Blackford wrote: Thank you for your response! I am currently replacing the call_control module used with CDRTool Prepaid with the dialog module using hash tables. The speed and stability are tremendously better! My concern is two-fold: 1) I do not want calls to be blocked because I set the hash table size too small. 2) I do not want any memory usage problems that could cause kamailio stability issues. My understanding, or at least how I want to use the "hash_size" modparam, is that hash_size gives dialog a set memory space (aka slots and buckets) to store the dialogs being tracked. This is great since I "think" I will have constant memory consumption that will be a fixed amount and never "grow". However, I wanted to get a rough idea of how many dialogs (customer calls) I could track per kamailio instance to properly choose the hash size. I thought it would be easy to set the value to something very small in the lab and just run up the number of calls until kamailio hits an upper limit and fails to create any more dialogs. modparam("dialog", "hash_size", 32) However, I am able to create almost 2000 dialogs no matter what size I choose. After, reading the information in the link about hash tables and your response, I see how a larger table with more "hashing" increases lookup performance, but I still do not see how the total number of dialogs that the module tracks can be set so that the kamailio memory usage is protected. I still look at the hash_size as the key here and that there should be a relationship, perhaps rough at best, to the maximum number of dialogs supported in the table. Thanks so much for your time, Mark Blackord Digium Cloud Services On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: -- Mark Blackford Digium Cloud Services 678.230.8769 -- Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com