1 Aug
2016
1 Aug
'16
3:14 p.m.
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
1 Aug
1 Aug
3:25 p.m.
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072
<http://sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
3:33 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
3:46 p.m.
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
6:57 p.m.
Hi All,
I've been going through my script against other examples on the internet
and cannot see any differences, also changing use_received between 1 and 0
makes no different.
Kamailio still uses the Contact header instead of the Route header.
If any one has any suggestions it would be very much appreciated, but I'll
continue going through the config line by line.
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:46, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path
module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
7:10 p.m.
Luke,
This is actually the behavior I would expect, though admittedly I've never
tried to rely on received= parameter routing for requests (I wasn't aware
that was something that should be supported).
However, you're probably better of addressing your NAT issues in a
different part of your request lifecycle. Could you share a bit more about
the setup you're using here? Is this Freeswitch dialing out to a registered
endpoint? Where are registrations being handled? How is FS creating the
route headers?
If you just start with a layout if your infrastructure it'll probably
answer all those questions and we can come up with a solution from there.
Best,
Colin
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi All,
I've been going through my script against other examples on the internet
and cannot see any differences, also changing use_received between 1 and 0
makes no different.
Kamailio still uses the Contact header instead of the Route header.
If any one has any suggestions it would be very much appreciated, but I'll
continue going through the config line by line.
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:46, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the
path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
2 Aug
2 Aug
9:52 a.m.
Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and
print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send
the result to this mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path
module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some
FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a
Route header including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072
<http://sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to
the rfc1918 address instead of the received IP:PORT in the
Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the
received parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
11:40 a.m.
Morning Gents,
Firstly, thanks for taking the time to reply :)
Kamailio is doing the NAT detection and simply acting as a passthrough to
FreeSWITCH (which handles all SIP registrations etc).
Will setup the log lines shortly and share the results.
kamailio -V outputs;
version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 83e842
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 83e842
compiled on 18:22:39 Jan 26 2016 with gcc 4.9.2
Kind regards,
Luke - Chicane Support
On 2 August 2016 at 07:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and
print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send
the result to this mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
11:49 a.m.
I added the below xlog lines into my script:
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before loose_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before record_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "After both: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
Which generated the below output in syslog:
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before
loose_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before
record_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: After
both: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Seems that the destination URI is never set, the Route header is below:
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
The use_received modparam for path is also set to 1.
Any idea's/suggestions are greatly appreciated :)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:40, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Morning Gents,
Firstly, thanks for taking the time to reply :)
Kamailio is doing the NAT detection and simply acting as a passthrough to
FreeSWITCH (which handles all SIP registrations etc).
Will setup the log lines shortly and share the results.
kamailio -V outputs;
version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 83e842
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 83e842
compiled on 18:22:39 Jan 26 2016 with gcc 4.9.2
Kind regards,
Luke - Chicane Support
On 2 August 2016 at 07:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and
print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send
the result to this mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
including received information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
3 Aug
3 Aug
2:22 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
I've added some more logging and can see loose_route() is returning -1 -
route calculation has been unsuccessful.
Is there a way of finding out why this is the case?
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:49, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I added the below xlog lines into my script:
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before loose_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before record_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "After both: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
Which generated the below output in syslog:
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before
loose_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: Before
record_route: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE: <script>: After
both: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 - <null>
Seems that the destination URI is never set, the Route header is below:
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
The use_received modparam for path is also set to 1.
Any idea's/suggestions are greatly appreciated :)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:40, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Morning Gents,
Firstly, thanks for taking the time to reply :)
Kamailio is doing the NAT detection and simply acting as a passthrough to
FreeSWITCH (which handles all SIP registrations etc).
Will setup the log lines shortly and share the results.
kamailio -V outputs;
version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 83e842
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 83e842
compiled on 18:22:39 Jan 26 2016 with gcc 4.9.2
Kind regards,
Luke - Chicane Support
On 2 August 2016 at 07:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and
print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send
the result to this mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
> boxes.
>
> When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
> including received information, example below;
>
> Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
>
> When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
> address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
>
> Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
>
>
> if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the
> received parameter?
>
>
> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
4 Aug
4 Aug
8:56 a.m.
Hello,
set debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and look at log messages in syslog.
If you find it too verbose, use dispatcher module and set debug level
only for core and rr modules to 3.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/08/16 13:22, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've added some more logging and can see loose_route() is returning -1
- route calculation has been unsuccessful.
Is there a way of finding out why this is the case?
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:49, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>> wrote:
I added the below xlog lines into my script:
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before loose_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before record_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "After both: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
Which generated the below output in syslog:
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE:
<script>: Before loose_route: 10.10.0.25 ->
sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 <http://sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062> -
<null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE:
<script>: Before record_route: 10.10.0.25 ->
sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062 <http://sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062> -
<null>
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5 /sbin/kamailio[529]: NOTICE:
<script>: After both: 10.10.0.25 -> sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062
<http://sip:201@192.168.1.114:5062> - <null>
Seems that the destination URI is never set, the Route header is
below:
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072
<http://sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072/>>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
The use_received modparam for path is also set to 1.
Any idea's/suggestions are greatly appreciated :)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:40, Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com <mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>> wrote:
Morning Gents,
Firstly, thanks for taking the time to reply :)
Kamailio is doing the NAT detection and simply acting as a
passthrough to FreeSWITCH (which handles all SIP registrations
etc).
Will setup the log lines shortly and share the results.
kamailio -V outputs;
version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 83e842
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS,
USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER,
USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT
PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 83e842
compiled on 18:22:39 Jan 26 2016 with gcc 4.9.2
Kind regards,
Luke - Chicane Support
On 2 August 2016 at 07:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log
message and print $ru and $du before and after
loose_route() in config and then send the result to this
mailing list?
Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Is it correct to use loose_route()
along side the path
module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hi all,
Currently trying to use Kamailio as a
passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes.
When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which
contains a Route header including received
information, example below;
Route: <sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072
<http://sip:201@10.10.2.5:5072>>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the
invite to the rfc1918 address instead of the
received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
if you use path module, have you enabled the
option to use the received parameter?
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.org
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
--
Luke Milbourne
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne(a)gmail.com
<mailto:luke.milbourne@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3032
days inactive
3035
days old
10 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Colin Morelli -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Luke Milbourne