Hello,
I have made some test with cisco ip phone & blind transfer and I have a question.
Example:
A: a@toto.com
B: b@toto.com
C: c@toto.com
M: mobile@toto.com
A calls B but B forward the call to C, C answer the call and transfer the call to a mobile phone M via a pstn gateway.
When C sends the REFER request to A we have something like this:
REFER.
From: b@toto.com
To: a@toto.com
Refer-To: mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com
And then when A sends the Invite to the gateways:
INVITE.
From: a@toto.com
To: mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com
But the call is transferred by C and not by B so the Referred-By: is not correct. Is that an error from the cisco ip phone (I think not) and how can I bill this call (I do the billing on the gateways).
Thanks.
Laurent
Schweizer Laurent wrote: ...
When C sends the REFER request to A we have something like this:
REFER…
From: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
To: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
Refer-To: mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
Here, I would suggest Referred-By: c@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
regards, klaus
And then when A sends the Invite to the gateways:
INVITE…
From: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
To: mobile@toto.com mailto:mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
But the call is transferred by C and not by B so the Referred-By: is not correct. Is that an error from the cisco ip phone (I think not) and how can I bill this call (I do the billing on the gateways).
Thanks.
Laurent
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Here, I would suggest Referred-By: c@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
The mailto:..... was not in the original message (I think that he was added by the email client)
I also think that Referred-By: c@toto.com is better that Referred-By: b@toto.com but this is done by the cisco ip Phone.
Is that correct or not ?
Laurent
-----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] Sent: mercredi, 11. mai 2005 14:10 To: Schweizer Laurent Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Billing and Blind call transfer
Schweizer Laurent wrote: ...
When C sends the REFER request to A we have something like this:
REFER.
From: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
To: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
Refer-To: mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
Here, I would suggest Referred-By: c@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
regards, klaus
And then when A sends the Invite to the gateways:
INVITE.
From: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
To: mobile@toto.com mailto:mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
But the call is transferred by C and not by B so the Referred-By: is not correct. Is that an error from the cisco ip phone (I think not) and how can I bill this call (I do the billing on the gateways).
Thanks.
Laurent
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Schweizer Laurent wrote:
Here, I would suggest Referred-By: c@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
The mailto:..... was not in the original message (I think that he was added by the email client)
I also think that Referred-By: c@toto.com is better that Referred-By: b@toto.com but this is done by the cisco ip Phone.
Is that correct or not ?
I don,t know. Propably you should ask at the sip-implementors list.
regards, klaus
How is B forwarding the call to C? Is the UAC generating a 300 code to be returned or is the forwarding handled by ser (ie. storing an AVP for B and then using avp_pushto() when the initial invite comes in)?
Schweizer Laurent wrote:
Hello,
I have made some test with cisco ip phone & blind transfer and I have a question.
Example:
A: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
B: b@toto.com
C: c@toto.com
M: mobile@toto.com
A calls B but B forward the call to C, C answer the call and transfer the call to a mobile phone M via a pstn gateway.
When C sends the REFER request to A we have something like this:
REFER…
From: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
To: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
Refer-To: mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
And then when A sends the Invite to the gateways:
INVITE…
From: a@toto.com mailto:a@toto.com
To: mobile@toto.com mailto:mobile@toto.com
Referred-By: b@toto.com mailto:b@toto.com
But the call is transferred by C and not by B so the Referred-By: is not correct. Is that an error from the cisco ip phone (I think not) and how can I bill this call (I do the billing on the gateways).
Thanks.
Laurent
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-
Evan Borgström -
Klaus Darilion -
Schweizer Laurent