Here, I would suggest
Referred-By: c(a)toto.com <mailto:b@toto.com>
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
The <mailto:.....> was not in the original message (I think that he was
added by the email client)
I also think that
Referred-By: c(a)toto.com is better that Referred-By: b(a)toto.com but this is
done by the cisco ip Phone.
Is that correct or not ?
Laurent
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at]
Sent: mercredi, 11. mai 2005 14:10
To: Schweizer Laurent
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Billing and Blind call transfer
Schweizer Laurent wrote:
...
When C sends the REFER request to A we have something
like this:
REFER.
From: b(a)toto.com <mailto:b@toto.com>
To: a(a)toto.com <mailto:a@toto.com>
Refer-To: mobile(a)toto.com
Referred-By: b(a)toto.com <mailto:b@toto.com>
Here, I would suggest
Referred-By: c(a)toto.com <mailto:b@toto.com>
btw: why is there no SIP URI, but a mailto URI?
regards,
klaus
And then when A sends the Invite to the gateways:
INVITE.
From: a(a)toto.com <mailto:a@toto.com>
To: mobile(a)toto.com <mailto:mobile@toto.com>
Referred-By: b(a)toto.com <mailto:b@toto.com>
But the call is transferred by C and not by B so the Referred-By: is not
correct. Is that an error from the cisco ip phone (I think not) and how
can I bill this call (I do the billing on the gateways).
Thanks.
Laurent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers