Hi Tomasz,
its strange, I'll check when I get some time for it.
Do you use 2.0.rcX or HEAD?
Anyway, you can temporarilly use @hf_value from textops for the same
purpose...
Expressions are evalueated form left to right, so
if (A && B) - if A is false, B is not evaluated at all...
Michal
On Po, 2007-06-18 at 09:20 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
Hi,
Michal when I check the condition for Allow header I get the following:
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: Unable to resolve select 'Allow' at level 2
Jun 18 09:15:08 rd ser[20567]: BUG: route.c:358: Unable to resolve select
Cheers
Tomasz
> On Pá, 2007-06-15 at 10:45 +0200, Vaclav Kubart wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > > if (@ruri == "sip:name@domain") ?
> >
> > something like this could work. Try it and you will see. :-)
>
> Yes, or use (@ruri.name == "name")
>
> > > There would be nice to have such functionality that when UA registers
> > > and there is no MESSAGE message indicated in the Allow header field
> > > the offline messages are not dumped to the UA.
> >
> > You can do such test in your config script before calling m_dump (if
> > triggered by REGISTER). It is possible to search using regular
> > expression (look for 'search' function usage in example config files).
>
> if (@msg.header["Allow"] =~ "mwi") might be faster and more
elegant way
>
> Michal
>