Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: sip:CARRIER_IP;lr
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the local Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
Cheers, Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: sip:CARRIER_IP;lr
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the local
Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1 domain listed and that’s local. I also toggled the register_myself parameter and it is still removing the none local CARRIER_IP.
The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag, apart from that it looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it locally.
I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing things in Azure and on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well, what other steps do you suggest if any?
Thanks for the reply.
Jon
Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierlamailto:miconda@gmail.com Sent: 27 July 2020 09:04 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listmailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org; Jonathan Huntermailto:hunterj91@hotmail.com; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listmailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
Cheers, Daniel On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote: Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: sip:CARRIER_IP;lrsip:CARRIER_IP;lr
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the local Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.orgmailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-usershttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.kamailio.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsr-users&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=cJ0imbe44ne4H9qzwb61orfVg9Qbi0bVs9GPZXJ%2BX58%3D&reserved=0
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comhttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asipto.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=Tcz4WnXWfZSau9kATS6O7mn2VgP9EfzI1R5wiXG9AvI%3D&reserved=0
www.twitter.com/micondahttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twitter.com%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=3TKqjKKsN2kPZPvrSgu8IpZ10vxKm9Ic5TkXcIhdNFM%3D&reserved=0 -- www.linkedin.com/in/micondahttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=9qYTiFuMwyyYjku8lBTulY4sOWSQ4XXrqdVKXlCvmPo%3D&reserved=0
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierlahttps://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paypal.me%2Fdcmierla&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=jV%2FMxPitAEk0BUV9ZlCXQPHiDAdM3a64HuW%2F%2B6H4rek%3D&reserved=0
Hello,
maybe the R-URI (address in the first line) is coming with a local domain/ip, and then strict routing is done, meaning that next route header is moved to R-URI, from where it can be overwritten by other config actions.
Anyhow, set debug=3 and what the messages printed by rr module and core when executing loose_route(), it shoud show if the URI in the route or R-URI is matching myself.
Be also, you don't have any remove_hf("Route") executed by mistake (you can use debugger module with cfgtrace enabled to check what actions are executed).
Cheers, Daniel
On 27.07.20 12:12, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1 domain listed and that’s local. I also toggled the register_myself parameter and it is still removing the none local CARRIER_IP.
The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag, apart from that it looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it locally.
I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing things in Azure and on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well, what other steps do you suggest if any?
Thanks for the reply.
Jon
Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
*From: *Daniel-Constantin Mierla mailto:miconda@gmail.com *Sent: *27 July 2020 09:04 *To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org; Jonathan Hunter mailto:hunterj91@hotmail.com; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
Cheers, Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys, Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT. I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is consistently being removed by kamailio at this point. ie Route: <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr> <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr> Is this normal or configuration related? As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the local Proxy IP. Please can someone advise? Many thanks Jon Sent from Mail <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657967884&sdata=VDmyqv%2BAtQjg9pfS1GfCxkH1Z1KtDcKyiAGcDzykrBk%3D&reserved=0> for Windows 10 _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.kamailio.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsr-users&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=cJ0imbe44ne4H9qzwb61orfVg9Qbi0bVs9GPZXJ%2BX58%3D&reserved=0>
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asipto.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=Tcz4WnXWfZSau9kATS6O7mn2VgP9EfzI1R5wiXG9AvI%3D&reserved=0 www.twitter.com/miconda https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twitter.com%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=3TKqjKKsN2kPZPvrSgu8IpZ10vxKm9Ic5TkXcIhdNFM%3D&reserved=0 -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=9qYTiFuMwyyYjku8lBTulY4sOWSQ4XXrqdVKXlCvmPo%3D&reserved=0 Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paypal.me%2Fdcmierla&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=jV%2FMxPitAEk0BUV9ZlCXQPHiDAdM3a64HuW%2F%2B6H4rek%3D&reserved=0