24 Jul
2020
24 Jul
'20
1:58 p.m.
Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr>
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the
local
Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
27 Jul
27 Jul
11:04 a.m.
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global
parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself
modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back
out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local
route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr>
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header
which doesnt contain the local
Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
1:12 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1 domain listed and that’s
local. I also toggled the register_myself parameter and it is still removing the none
local CARRIER_IP.
The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag, apart from that it
looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it locally.
I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing things in Azure and
on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well, what other steps do you suggest if any?
Thanks for the reply.
Jon
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
Sent: 27 July 2020 09:04
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>;
Jonathan Hunter<mailto:hunterj91@hotmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global parameter or inside the
domain module records with register_myself modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those
cases happens?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr><sip:CARRIER_IP;lr>
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt contain the
local
Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from
Mail<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg…
for Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users<https://nam…
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%…
www.twitter.com/miconda<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…
--
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.c…
Funding:
https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outloo…
1:22 p.m.
Hello,
maybe the R-URI (address in the first line) is coming with a local
domain/ip, and then strict routing is done, meaning that next route
header is moved to R-URI, from where it can be overwritten by other
config actions.
Anyhow, set debug=3 and what the messages printed by rr module and core
when executing loose_route(), it shoud show if the URI in the route or
R-URI is matching myself.
Be also, you don't have any remove_hf("Route") executed by mistake (you
can use debugger module with cfgtrace enabled to check what actions are
executed).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.07.20 12:12, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1
domain listed and that’s local. I also toggled the register_myself
parameter and it is still removing the none local CARRIER_IP.
The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag,
apart from that it looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it
locally.
I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing
things in Azure and on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well,
what other steps do you suggest if any?
Thanks for the reply.
Jon
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
*From: *Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>
*Sent: *27 July 2020 09:04
*To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; Jonathan Hunter
<mailto:hunterj91@hotmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header
Hello,
that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global
parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself
modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,
Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side
back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none
local route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
ie Route: <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr> <sip:CARRIER_IP;lr>
Is this normal or configuration related?
As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header
which doesnt contain the local
Proxy IP.
Please can someone advise?
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mail
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657967884&sdata=VDmyqv%2BAtQjg9pfS1GfCxkH1Z1KtDcKyiAGcDzykrBk%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows 10
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.kamailio.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsr-users&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=cJ0imbe44ne4H9qzwb61orfVg9Qbi0bVs9GPZXJ%2BX58%3D&reserved=0>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asipto.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=Tcz4WnXWfZSau9kATS6O7mn2VgP9EfzI1R5wiXG9AvI%3D&reserved=0>
www.twitter.com/miconda
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twitter.com%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879&sdata=3TKqjKKsN2kPZPvrSgu8IpZ10vxKm9Ic5TkXcIhdNFM%3D&reserved=0>
-- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmiconda&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=9qYTiFuMwyyYjku8lBTulY4sOWSQ4XXrqdVKXlCvmPo%3D&reserved=0>
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paypal.me%2Fdcmierla&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873&sdata=jV%2FMxPitAEk0BUV9ZlCXQPHiDAdM3a64HuW%2F%2B6H4rek%3D&reserved=0>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
1582
days inactive
1585
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Jonathan Hunter