[Serusers] meeting (was: Re: [Serdev] SER's core design features(process model/parser/lumps/script) - was: So who/what is SER for, anyway?
We could use the IETF meeting in Prague in March. Actually, I have anticipated that and there is a hotel room reserved already :-) Could folks willing to show up and debate roadmap or whatever else appears important technically speak up now?
-jiri
At 12:08 25/01/2007, Olle E Johansson wrote:
As I am fighting the same issues and try to make chan_sip easier for the administrator, would it be a good idea with a joint Open Source SIP developer meeting somewhere in Europe this spring?
We have a lot of common issues, need to settle with the same terminology and propably fight the same fights with RFCs to implement...
A lot of of users use both Asterisk and SER/OPENSER, so they need interoperability.
For my work on a new chan_sip, please check http://www.codename- pineapple.org
/O _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
We could use the IETF meeting in Prague in March. Actually, I have anticipated that and there is a hotel room reserved already :-)
You mean you have a suite where we can all show up, drink and smoke and later trash the furniture? Hell, yeah!
Could folks willing to show up and debate roadmap or whatever else appears important technically speak up now?
I'd rather prefer some warm, sunny place with good coffee, but since I'll happen to be in Prague at that time, I speak up now.
But I'll second Olle's idea for a Open Source SIP Conference thingie. There used to be an Open Telephony Summit in Germany. Dunno if this one still exists. The one I attended was very Asterisk and SME focused, though.
Regards, Martin
Hi!
Martin Hoffmann wrote:
You mean you have a suite where we can all show up, drink and smoke and later trash the furniture? Hell, yeah!
Count me in on that, although I'd also prefer a sunny place ;)
But I'll second Olle's idea for a Open Source SIP Conference thingie. There used to be an Open Telephony Summit in Germany. Dunno if this one still exists. The one I attended was very Asterisk and SME focused, though.
Last years Open Telephony Summit[0] took place in conjunction with the Linuxtag in Wiesbaden[1]. The days before a group of VoIP (mostly H323) folks gathered at the Linuxhotel [2] for a great workshop weekend. Many people (openh323, opal, Asterisk, ...) said they'd love to see a similar event.
I'll shoot Jochen Topf (German Unix User Group and organizer of last years event) a mail and ask about the status. Nils Magnus probably also has some information.
The Asterisk event (Asterisk Tag [3]) moved from Bremen to Chemnitz to join the Chemnitzer Linuxtage [4].
Just FYI, Hendrik
P.S. How about limiting this thread to either serdev@ or serusers@?
0: http://www.linuxtag.org/2006/en/besucher/konferenzen/3rd-telephony-summit.ht... 1: http://www.linuxtag.org/2006/ 2: http://www.linuxhotel.de/ 3: http://www.asterisk-tag.org/ 4: http://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2007/info/
Hi!
There's an event planned. From the website:
Free Software/Open Source Telephony Summit, 4-5 April 2007
This year, the Free Software and Open Source Telephony Summit comes to Paris, France on the 4th and 5th of April.
http://fostel2007.fostel.org/index.php/Main_Page
Cheers, Hendrik
I'm in. And I vote for Prague ;-) g-)
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
We could use the IETF meeting in Prague in March. Actually, I have anticipated that and there is a hotel room reserved already :-) Could folks willing to show up and debate roadmap or whatever else appears important technically speak up now?
-jiri
At 12:08 25/01/2007, Olle E Johansson wrote:
As I am fighting the same issues and try to make chan_sip easier for the administrator, would it be a good idea with a joint Open Source SIP developer meeting somewhere in Europe this spring?
We have a lot of common issues, need to settle with the same terminology and propably fight the same fights with RFCs to implement...
A lot of of users use both Asterisk and SER/OPENSER, so they need interoperability.
For my work on a new chan_sip, please check http://www.codename- pineapple.org
/O _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
Hi!
I checked out the latest source from cvs and after compilation and running ser I get the folling error: ERROR: module version mismatch for /home/ser/src/ser-0.10.99/modules/mysql/mysql.so; core: ser 0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux); module: ser 0.10.99-dev64 (i386/linux)
What could be wrong? i did everything as normally #make proper #make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence" all
Bests TOmasz
You haven't recompiled mysql module and the one ser is trying to use is an older version.
I am not familiar with make groups...but probably you chould include mysql. Try:
make proper make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence mysql" all
samuel.
2007/1/30, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi!
I checked out the latest source from cvs and after compilation and running ser I get the folling error: ERROR: module version mismatch for /home/ser/src/ser-0.10.99/modules/mysql/mysql.so; core: ser 0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux); module: ser 0.10.99-dev64 (i386/linux)
What could be wrong? i did everything as normally #make proper #make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence" all
Bests TOmasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I dodn't what was wrong but after I made make clean and then make foro those modules wich where in conflict everything started to work
samuel napisa?(a):
You haven't recompiled mysql module and the one ser is trying to use is an older version.
I am not familiar with make groups...but probably you chould include mysql. Try:
make proper make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence mysql" all
samuel.
2007/1/30, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi!
I checked out the latest source from cvs and after compilation and running ser I get the folling error: ERROR: module version mismatch for /home/ser/src/ser-0.10.99/modules/mysql/mysql.so; core: ser 0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux); module: ser 0.10.99-dev64 (i386/linux)
What could be wrong? i did everything as normally #make proper #make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence" all
Bests TOmasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
One just has to remember that ALL executions of make calculates the target set of modules. Thus, make proper will not clean all modules, just the standard set. make group_include="groups-to-include" proper will do the trick.
g-)
samuel wrote:
You haven't recompiled mysql module and the one ser is trying to use is an older version.
I am not familiar with make groups...but probably you chould include mysql. Try:
make proper make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence mysql" all
samuel.
2007/1/30, tzieleniewski tzieleniewski@o2.pl:
Hi!
I checked out the latest source from cvs and after compilation and running ser I get the folling error: ERROR: module version mismatch for /home/ser/src/ser-0.10.99/modules/mysql/mysql.so; core: ser 0.10.99-dev66 (i386/linux); module: ser 0.10.99-dev64 (i386/linux)
What could be wrong? i did everything as normally #make proper #make group_include="standard standard-dep stable presence" all
Bests TOmasz _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
See you therE!
-atle
* Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org [070125 20:12]:
We could use the IETF meeting in Prague in March. Actually, I have anticipated that and there is a hotel room reserved already :-) Could folks willing to show up and debate roadmap or whatever else appears important technically speak up now?
-jiri
At 12:08 25/01/2007, Olle E Johansson wrote:
As I am fighting the same issues and try to make chan_sip easier for the administrator, would it be a good idea with a joint Open Source SIP developer meeting somewhere in Europe this spring?
We have a lot of common issues, need to settle with the same terminology and propably fight the same fights with RFCs to implement...
A lot of of users use both Asterisk and SER/OPENSER, so they need interoperability.
For my work on a new chan_sip, please check http://www.codename- pineapple.org
/O _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-
Atle Samuelsen -
Greger V. Teigre -
Hendrik Scholz -
Jiri Kuthan -
Martin Hoffmann -
samuel -
tzieleniewski