Hello,
ok, thanks for testing. I backported to 5.3 as well.
There seemed to be an issue with the size of the variables used to
match. Just for reference, I typically use $shv(x) variables these days
if I need to set some value via rpc and test it in config, it is more or
less like gflags, but you can have many and they can be controlled via
rpc with pv.shvSet/Get from pv module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.03.20 17:35, Yufei Tao wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yes it's worked! Thank you very much for the quick response :)
Cheers,
Yufei
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 15:59, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
try with the patch from commit:
*
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5411eda4e44a487479d00433583a68a…
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.03.20 15:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
can you try:
kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag i:1024
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.03.20 12:12, Yufei Tao wrote:
Hi,
I got some problems with is_gflags:
1. Set the gflag:
# kamcmd cfgutils.set_gflag 1024
2. Check the gflags - fine:
# kamcmd cfgutils.get_gflags
0x400 (1024)
3. Check using is_gflag - problem:
# kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag 1024
FALSE
Seems is_gflag always returns FALSE somehow. Calling function
is_gflag() from the cfg file seems to always return FALSE too.
I tried this on Kamailio 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 and the behaviour is
the same.
Best regards,
Yufei
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users --
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>