ljzhang,
Also, one post is usually sufficient to get a response from this mailing
list.
Regards,
Paul
On 4/12/05, ljzhang <xueyou38(a)163.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.
1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper
transverse?
2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy?
3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT
transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of
types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER
with nathelper.
Thanks a lot!
ljzhang
xueyou38(a)163.com
2005-04-12
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers