16 Mar
2015
16 Mar
'15
6:18 a.m.
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I need
analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
16 Mar
16 Mar
6:44 a.m.
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used:
Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used:
Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I need
analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
12:24 p.m.
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ovoshlook@gmail.com>>:
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint -
kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination,
but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless
mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
1:44 p.m.
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used:
Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used:
Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:43 p.m.
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry,
server error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran:
new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran:
new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the
URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the
URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ovoshlook@gmail.com>>:
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one
endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is
branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to
destination, but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless
mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
2:46 p.m.
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or
other routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:14 p.m.
I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message is
the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference i
that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs
append_branch("sip:$tU@
$(du{s.select,1,:})")
This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer and
then at the "while" do this
sql_pvquery("ca", "select
received from location where
contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)");
$du=$var(recieved);
xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}.
Destination is {$du}\n");
# if only one client used it means that I use $ru
if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1)
{
xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT");
xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
route("FINAL_RELAY");
}
else
{
append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7");
}
#after while ended if more that one endpoint used
t_on_branch("1");
return;
branch_route[1]{
if($du=~"transport=ws"){
xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
}
else{
xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove
RTP/AVP");
t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY");
}
}
route[FINAL_RELAY]
{
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
return;
}
2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Is this used in request_route or in
failure_route or other routing
block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but
I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3:58 p.m.
Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route?
Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what
actions from kamailio.cfg are executed.
Just changing the $ru and relaying should work when used in request_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 14:14, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of
creating INVOTE
message is the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only
one difference i that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs
append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})")
This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer
and then at the "while" do this
sql_pvquery("ca",
"select received from location where
contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)");
$du=$var(recieved);
xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}.
Destination is {$du}\n");
# if only one client used it means that I use $ru
if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1)
{
xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT");
xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
route("FINAL_RELAY");
}
else
{
append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7");
}
#after while ended if more that one endpoint used
t_on_branch("1");
return;
branch_route[1]{
if($du=~"transport=ws"){
xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
}
else{
xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove
RTP/AVP");
t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY");
}
}
route[FINAL_RELAY]
{
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
return;
}
2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ovoshlook@gmail.com>>:
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other
routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for
forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl
[sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri
invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR:
t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri
invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR:
t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to
process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
sl_reply_error used: Regretfully, we were not able to
process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on
branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko
<ovoshlook(a)gmail.com <mailto:ovoshlook@gmail.com>>:
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using append_branch. It works fine but when I
have only one endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE
requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next
one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest
to destination, but I can not see this function at
kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at
stateless mode. I need analog of it or seturi that
works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
4:52 p.m.
Hello
Just modify RURI, t_relay(), and a new branch will automatically be created
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route?
Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what
actions from kamailio.cfg are executed.
Just changing the $ru and relaying should work when used in request_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 14:14, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message
is the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference
i that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs
append_branch("
sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})")
This is full algo of my reqest
the first is I check at location table num of endpoints for this peer and
then at the "while" do this
sql_pvquery("ca", "select
received from location where
contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)");
$du=$var(recieved);
xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}.
Destination is {$du}\n");
# if only one client used it means that I use $ru
if ($dbr(ra=>rows)==1)
{
xlog("L_INFO","Single ANGENT");
xlog("L_INFO","WS Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
route("FINAL_RELAY");
}
else
{
append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})","0.7");
}
#after while ended if more that one endpoint used
t_on_branch("1");
return;
branch_route[1]{
if($du=~"transport=ws"){
xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin
replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF");
t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS");
}
else{
xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n");
rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove
RTP/AVP");
t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY");
}
}
route[FINAL_RELAY]
{
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
return;
}
2015-03-16 15:46 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Is this used in request_route or in
failure_route or other routing
block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t
failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t
failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using
> append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
> generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
> As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
> I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but
> I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
> Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
> need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
3543
days inactive
3543
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Abdul Gafar -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Yuriy Gorlichenko