sr-dev February 2011

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

22 participants
124 discussions

git:alfredh/stun: ser_stun: update to RFC 5389

by Alfred E. Heggestad

Module: sip-router Branch: alfredh/stun Commit: d88efbcc410e5bdc16eb0df69d93fe16adf6b9e4 URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=d88efbc… Author: Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh(a)db.org> Committer: Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh(a)db.org> Date: Tue Feb 22 11:13:14 2011 +0100 ser_stun: update to RFC 5389 - Removing checking/adding of FINGERPRINT attibute - Update some attribute values according to new spec - Fix endianess of XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS --- ser_stun.c | 153 ++++-------------------------------------------------------- ser_stun.h | 9 +-- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) diff --git a/ser_stun.c b/ser_stun.c index 6957a88..7eb2cf5 100644 --- a/ser_stun.c +++ b/ser_stun.c @@ -64,9 +64,7 @@ int stun_add_address_attr(struct stun_msg* res, int do_xor); int add_unknown_attr(struct stun_msg* res, struct stun_unknown_att* unknown); int add_error_code(struct stun_msg* res, USHORT_T error_code); -int add_fingerprint(struct stun_buffer* msg); int copy_str_to_buffer(struct stun_msg* res, const char* data, UINT_T pad); -int validate_fingerprint(struct stun_msg* req, USHORT_T* error_code); int reallock_buffer(struct stun_buffer* buffer, UINT_T len); int buf_copy(struct stun_buffer* msg, void* source, UINT_T len); void clean_memory(struct stun_msg* req, @@ -231,11 +229,9 @@ int stun_parse_body( struct stun_unknown_att* tmp_unknown; struct stun_unknown_att* body; char* buf; - int fp_present; attr_size = sizeof(struct stun_attr); buf = &req->msg.buf.s[sizeof(struct stun_hdr)]; - fp_present = 0; /* * Mark the body lenght as unparsed. @@ -286,7 +282,6 @@ int stun_parse_body( case MAPPED_ADDRESS_ATTR: case XOR_MAPPED_ADDRESS_ATTR: case ALTERNATE_SERVER_ATTR: - case REFRESH_INTERVAL_ATTR: case RESPONSE_ADDRESS_ATTR: case SOURCE_ADDRESS_ATTR: case REFLECTED_FROM_ATTR: @@ -300,10 +295,9 @@ int stun_parse_body( /* following attributes must be padded to 4 bytes */ case USERNAME_ATTR: - case PASSWORD_ATTR: case ERROR_CODE_ATTR: case UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTES_ATTR: - case SERVER_ATTR: + case SOFTWARE_ATTR: padded_len = PADDED_TO_FOUR(ntohs(attr.len)); #ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_parse_body: padded to four\n"); @@ -322,25 +316,8 @@ int stun_parse_body( #ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_parse_body: fingerprint attribute found\n"); #endif - fp_present = 1; - if (ntohs(attr.len) != SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH) { - LOG(L_WARN, - "WARNING: STUN: Incorrect fingerprint of request.\n"); - *error_code = BAD_REQUEST_ERR; - continue; - } - - memcpy(req->fp, buf, SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH); - if(stun_allow_fp) { - if (validate_fingerprint(req, error_code) != 0) { - LOG(L_WARN, - "WARNING: STUN: Incorrect fingerprint of request.\n"); - *error_code = BAD_REQUEST_ERR; - continue; - } - } - padded_len = SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH; + if (not_parsed > SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH) { #ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_parse_body: fingerprint is not the last attribute\n"); @@ -396,14 +373,6 @@ int stun_parse_body( *error_code = UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTE_ERR; } - if (fp_present == 0 && req->old == 0) { -#ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG - LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_parse_body: fingerprint is missing is this new request\n"); -#endif - /* missing mandatory attribute fingerprint */ - *error_code = BAD_REQUEST_ERR; - } - return 0; } @@ -431,7 +400,6 @@ int stun_create_response( struct stun_unknown_att* unknown, UINT_T error_code) { - UINT_T msg_len; /* * Alloc some space for response. * Optimalization? - maybe it would be better to use biggish static array. @@ -480,14 +448,6 @@ int stun_create_response( #endif return FATAL_ERROR; } - - if (stun_add_common_integer_attr(res, REFRESH_INTERVAL_ATTR, - stun_refresh_interval) != 0) { -#ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG - LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_create_response: failed to common attributes\n"); -#endif - return FATAL_ERROR; - } } else { if (stun_add_address_attr(res, ri->src_ip.af, ri->src_port, @@ -532,10 +492,10 @@ int stun_create_response( if (req->old == 0) { /* - * add optional information about server; attribute SERVER is not a part of - * rfc3489.txt + * add optional information about server; attribute SOFTWARE is part of + * rfc5389.txt * */ - if (stun_add_common_text_attr(res, SERVER_ATTR, SERVER_HDR, PAD4)!=0) { + if (stun_add_common_text_attr(res, SOFTWARE_ATTR, SERVER_HDR, PAD4)!=0) { #ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_create_response: failed to add common text attribute\n"); #endif @@ -543,28 +503,9 @@ int stun_create_response( } } - if (req->old == 0 && stun_allow_fp) { - /* count length of body except header and fingerprint - * and copy message length at the beginning of buffer - */ - msg_len = res->msg.buf.len - sizeof(struct stun_hdr); - msg_len += SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH + sizeof(struct stun_attr); - res->hdr.len = htons(msg_len); - memcpy(&res->msg.buf.s[sizeof(USHORT_T)], (void *) &res->hdr.len, - sizeof(USHORT_T)); - - if (add_fingerprint(&res->msg) != 0) { -#ifdef EXTRA_DEBUG - LOG(L_DBG, "DEBUG: stun_create_response: failed to add fingerprint\n"); -#endif - return FATAL_ERROR; - } - } - else { - res->hdr.len = htons(res->msg.buf.len - sizeof(struct stun_hdr)); - memcpy(&res->msg.buf.s[sizeof(USHORT_T)], (void *) &res->hdr.len, - sizeof(USHORT_T)); - } + res->hdr.len = htons(res->msg.buf.len - sizeof(struct stun_hdr)); + memcpy(&res->msg.buf.s[sizeof(USHORT_T)], (void *) &res->hdr.len, + sizeof(USHORT_T)); return 0; } @@ -824,14 +765,14 @@ int stun_add_address_attr(struct stun_msg* res, ip_struct_len = 0; attr.type = htons(type); - res->ip_addr.port = (do_xor) ? htons(port) ^ MAGIC_COOKIE_2B : htons(port); + res->ip_addr.port = htons((do_xor) ? (port ^ MAGIC_COOKIE_2B) : port); switch(af) { case AF_INET: ip_struct_len = sizeof(struct stun_ip_addr) - 3*sizeof(UINT_T); res->ip_addr.family = htons(IPV4_FAMILY); memcpy(res->ip_addr.ip, ip_addr, IPV4_LEN); res->ip_addr.ip[0] = (do_xor) ? - res->ip_addr.ip[0] ^ MAGIC_COOKIE : res->ip_addr.ip[0]; + res->ip_addr.ip[0] ^ htonl(MAGIC_COOKIE) : res->ip_addr.ip[0]; break; #ifdef USE_IPV6 case AF_INET6: @@ -865,48 +806,6 @@ int stun_add_address_attr(struct stun_msg* res, } /* - * add_fingerprint() - * - msg: response buffer - * - * The function add_fingerprint ensures adding fingerprint attribute into - * response buffer. - * - * Return value: 0 if there is no environment error - * -1 if there is some enviroment error such as insufficiency - * of memory - */ -int add_fingerprint(struct stun_buffer* msg) -{ - struct stun_attr attr; - USHORT_T attr_type_size; - - attr_type_size = sizeof(struct stun_attr); - attr.type = htons(FINGERPRINT_ATTR); - attr.len = htons(SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH); - - if (msg->empty < (SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH + attr_type_size)) { - if (reallock_buffer(msg, SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH + attr_type_size) != 0) { - return FATAL_ERROR; - } - } - - memcpy(&msg->buf.s[msg->buf.len], (void *) &attr, attr_type_size); - msg->buf.len += attr_type_size; - msg->empty -= attr_type_size; - - if (SHA1((UCHAR_T *)msg->buf.s, msg->buf.len-attr_type_size, - (UCHAR_T *) &msg->buf.s[msg->buf.len]) == 0) { - LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: STUN: SHA-1 algorithm failed.\n"); - return FATAL_ERROR; - } - - msg->buf.len += SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH; - msg->empty -= SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH; - - return 0; -} - -/* * stun_alloc_unknown_attr() * - type: type of unknown attribute * @@ -958,38 +857,6 @@ void stun_delete_unknown_attrs(struct stun_unknown_att* unknown) } /* - * validate_fingerprint() - * - req: structure representing request message - * - error_code: indication of any protocol error - * - * The function validate_fingerprint ensures validation of FINGERPRINT - * attribute. - * - * Return value: 0 if there is no environment error - * -1 if there is some enviroment error such as insufficiency - * of memory - */ -int validate_fingerprint(struct stun_msg* req, USHORT_T* error_code) -{ - UCHAR_T msg_digest[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH]; - UINT_T buf_len; - - buf_len = req->hdr.len + sizeof(struct stun_hdr); - buf_len -= SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH + sizeof(struct stun_attr); - - if (SHA1((UCHAR_T *) req->msg.buf.s, buf_len, msg_digest) == 0) { - LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: STUN: SHA-1 algorithm failed.\n"); - return FATAL_ERROR; - } - - if (memcmp((void *)req->fp, (void *)&msg_digest, SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH) != 0) { - *error_code = BAD_REQUEST_ERR; - } - - return 0; -} - -/* * buf_copy() * - msg: buffer where the data will be copy to * - source: source data buffer diff --git a/ser_stun.h b/ser_stun.h index 1e6051b..b287a78 100644 --- a/ser_stun.h +++ b/ser_stun.h @@ -56,19 +56,17 @@ typedef unsigned long ULONG_T; /* common STUN attributes */ #define MAPPED_ADDRESS_ATTR 0x0001 #define USERNAME_ATTR 0x0006 -#define PASSWORD_ATTR 0x0007 #define MESSAGE_INTEGRITY_ATTR 0x0008 #define ERROR_CODE_ATTR 0x0009 #define UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTES_ATTR 0x000A -/* STUN attributes defined by rfc3489bis */ +/* STUN attributes defined by rfc5389 */ #define REALM_ATTR 0x0014 #define NONCE_ATTR 0x0015 #define XOR_MAPPED_ADDRESS_ATTR 0x0020 -#define FINGERPRINT_ATTR 0x0023 -#define SERVER_ATTR 0x8022 +#define FINGERPRINT_ATTR 0x8028 +#define SOFTWARE_ATTR 0x8022 #define ALTERNATE_SERVER_ATTR 0x8023 -#define REFRESH_INTERVAL_ATTR 0x8024 /* STUN attributes defined by rfc3489 */ #define RESPONSE_ADDRESS_ATTR 0x0002 @@ -167,7 +165,6 @@ struct stun_msg { struct stun_hdr hdr; struct stun_ip_addr ip_addr; /* XOR values for rfc3489bis, normal values for rfc3489 */ - char fp[SHA_DIGEST_LENGTH]; /* fingerprint value */ struct stun_buffer msg; UCHAR_T old; /* true: the format of message is in accordance with rfc3489 */

13 years, 11 months

[tracker] Comment added: bug in dialplan or core re.c

by sip-router

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#115 - bug in dialplan or core re.c User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) ---------- i have made the tests with latest 3.1 from git. here is what happens with subst_exp ^(.+:)\+358(.+) and input uri sip:+35892345674@test.fi using various repl_exps: - if repl_exp is \1\2, i get what is expected, i.e., both \1 and \2 are replaced and consumed: Feb 22 09:40:39 sip /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[7323]: INFO: uri <sip:92345674@test.fi> - if repl_exp is \1X\2, \1 is replaced but not consumed and i get: Feb 22 09:42:48 sip /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[7484]: INFO: uri <sip:\1X92345674@test.fi> - if repl_exp is \1X\2Y, i get Feb 22 09:44:50 sip /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[7642]: INFO: uri <sip:\1X92345674@test.fiY> i.e., \2 is correctly replaced and consumed, but again \1 is replaced, but not consumed. -- juha ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=115#comment165 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

13 years, 11 months

git:master: core: proper return code for pvar assignment

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Module: sip-router Branch: master Commit: 1f698797ec4def503630563c06f5aef4a7b40871 URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=1f69879… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: Mon Feb 21 23:15:29 2011 +0100 core: proper return code for pvar assignment - in some case the value of the right expression was returned instead of proper >=0 for success cases - reported by Juha Heinannen --- lvalue.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lvalue.c b/lvalue.c index e13e1a5..5d433f2 100644 --- a/lvalue.c +++ b/lvalue.c @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, break in expr*/ } else pval.ri=0; - ret=pval.ri; + ret=!(!pval.ri); break; case RV_BEXPR: /* logic/boolean expr. */ pval.flags=PV_TYPE_INT|PV_VAL_INT; @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, WARN("error in expression\n"); pval.ri=0; /* expr. is treated as false */ } - ret=pval.ri; + ret=!(!pval.ri); break; case RV_SEL: pval.flags=PV_VAL_STR; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, break; } } - ret=(pval.rs.len)>0; + ret=(pval.rs.len>0); break; case RV_AVP: r_avp = search_avp_by_index(rv->v.avps.type, rv->v.avps.name,

13 years, 11 months

[tracker] Task closed: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1

by sip-router

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task is now closed: FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) Reason for closing: Fixed Additional comments about closing: There was an inconsistency in returning code from a helper function used to assign the values for PVs, pretty harmless, but resulted in this error message -- revealed because I added the log message to spot failed assignments. Should be fixed now on git, try it and if still present, reopen the task. More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

13 years, 11 months

[tracker] User took ownership: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1

by sip-router

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. Daniel-Constantin Mierla has taken ownership of the following task: FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

13 years, 11 months

git:3.1: core: proper return code for pvar assignment

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Module: sip-router Branch: 3.1 Commit: 4ace86df07c55eb66f902fda3f37d198346bfb4a URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=4ace86d… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: Mon Feb 21 23:15:29 2011 +0100 core: proper return code for pvar assignment - in some case the value of the right expression was returned instead of proper >=0 for success cases - reported by Juha Heinannen (cherry picked from commit 1f698797ec4def503630563c06f5aef4a7b40871) --- lvalue.c | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lvalue.c b/lvalue.c index e13e1a5..5d433f2 100644 --- a/lvalue.c +++ b/lvalue.c @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, break in expr*/ } else pval.ri=0; - ret=pval.ri; + ret=!(!pval.ri); break; case RV_BEXPR: /* logic/boolean expr. */ pval.flags=PV_TYPE_INT|PV_VAL_INT; @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, WARN("error in expression\n"); pval.ri=0; /* expr. is treated as false */ } - ret=pval.ri; + ret=!(!pval.ri); break; case RV_SEL: pval.flags=PV_VAL_STR; @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ inline static int lval_pvar_assign(struct run_act_ctx* h, struct sip_msg* msg, break; } } - ret=(pval.rs.len)>0; + ret=(pval.rs.len>0); break; case RV_AVP: r_avp = search_avp_by_index(rv->v.avps.type, rv->v.avps.name,

13 years, 11 months

[tracker] Comment added: bug in dialplan or core re.c

by sip-router

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#115 - bug in dialplan or core re.c User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) ---------- What version are you running? Is it only \1 appearing there, or also \2? There was a fix in 3.1 for variable substitutions, but I haven't seen this one at all so far... ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=115#comment164 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

13 years, 11 months

[tracker] Comment added: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1

by sip-router

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) ---------- OK, then it might be something I introduced while I added back the printing of line for failed assignments. I will double check it. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114#comment163 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

13 years, 11 months

Employment Proposition. OVERVIEW.

by serdev＠iptel.org

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Flexible Shifts! Great Pay! Terrific Opportunity for a professional individual ready to move ahead in a great career. As a Representative/Admin Assistant/Admin Representative for our well-known, stable construction Company. [...] Content analysis details: (18.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL [178.93.56.220 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 1.6 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: resume-eur.com] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: resume-eur.com] 3.6 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 2) 3.2 FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D Helo is d-d-d-d 0.7 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [178.93.56.220 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5462] 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

13 years, 12 months

NEWVacancies

by nils＠iptel.org

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Flexible Shifts! Great Pay! Terrific Opportunity for a professional individual ready to move ahead in a great career. As a Representative/Admin Assistant/Admin Representative for our well-known, stable construction Company. [...] Content analysis details: (11.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [193.107.244.196 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 1.6 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: resume-eur.com] 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: resume-eur.com] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [193.107.244.196 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?193.107.244.196>] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5880] 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [193.107.244.196 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.0 T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

13 years, 12 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev February 2011