sr-dev February 2011

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

22 participants
124 discussions

[tracker] Task opened: bug in dialplan or core re.c
by sip-router 21 Feb '11

21 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) Attached to Project - sip-router Summary - bug in dialplan or core re.c Task Type - Bug Report Category - Module Status - New Assigned To - Operating System - All Severity - High Priority - Normal Reported Version - Development Due in Version - Undecided Due Date - Undecided Details - dialplan table record subst_exp/repl_exp ^(.+:)\+358(.+)/\1X\2 results as sip:\1X92345670@test.fi;user=phone when applied to sip:+35892345670@test.fi;user=phone this is wrong, because \1 should not be in the result. looks like the bug is in core re.c or in dialplan modules's use of re.c. More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=115 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Comment added: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1
by sip-router 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) ---------- assignment is not failing. var gets value -1. it is just the error message that needs to be get rid off. -- juha ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114#comment162 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Comment added: dispatcher pseudo variables
by sip-router 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#111 - dispatcher pseudo variables User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) ---------- I will try to implement in the near future, meanwhile, maybe next workaround gives you what you need: - set parameters for load balancing with failover - backup r-uri - do ds_select_domain("groupid", "8") - you will get in the AVPs: the URIs in the groupid ordered by priority, number of them and the attributes - restore the r-uri (since it was updated with the address in the first URI AVP) - AVPs can be accessed via indexes $(avp(x)[1]) ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=111#comment161 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] User took ownership: dispatcher pseudo variables
by sip-router 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. Daniel-Constantin Mierla has taken ownership of the following task: FS#111 - dispatcher pseudo variables More information can be found at the following URL: https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=111 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Comment added: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1
by sip-router 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 User who did this - Daniel-Constantin Mierla (miconda) ---------- Is the assignment failing? Or the variable is getting the value -1. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114#comment160 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Task opened: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1
by sip-router 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) Attached to Project - sip-router Summary - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - Assigned Assigned To - Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul Operating System - All Severity - High Priority - Normal Reported Version - Development Due in Version - Undecided Due Date - Undecided Details - starting from sr 3.1, assignment statement emits bugus error message like this: Feb 19 23:03:35 sip /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[10218]: ERROR: <core> [lvalue.c:411]: assignment failed at pos: (1415,50-1415,50) when a script function call resulting in value -1 appears on right of assignment operator. no such error message was produced in earlier versions of k or sr. please fix, since it thousands of such error messages in syslog don't look pretty. More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Assignee added: assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1
by sip-router 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#114 - assignment statement emits bogus error message in sr 3.1 User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=114 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

git:master: core: log message for no 2nd via in reply sent to L_DBG
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

Module: sip-router Branch: master Commit: 6a09b5abafe2b67e7f7959221d4486fab59c24a2 URL: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=6a09b5a… Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed Feb 16 10:53:31 2011 +0100 core: log message for no 2nd via in reply sent to L_DBG --- forward.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/forward.c b/forward.c index 175f54b..f073f7c 100644 --- a/forward.c +++ b/forward.c @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ int forward_reply(struct sip_msg* msg) || (msg->via2==0) || (msg->via2->error!=PARSE_OK)) { /* no second via => error */ - LOG(L_INFO, "broken reply to forward - no 2nd via\n"); + LOG(L_DBG, "broken reply to forward - no 2nd via\n"); goto error; }

2 2

[tracker] Comment added: Kamailio init script reports falsely "Kamailio already running"
by sip-router 15 Feb '11

15 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#113 - Kamailio init script reports falsely "Kamailio already running" User who did this - Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc) ---------- I've checked latest code and the pipe exists. However I'm getting strange behaviour when running Kamailio (last version) with some error in the conf script (i.e: a invalid user/pass in a DB connection). Basically I start kamailio, the module error is shown in the log, but 3 processes remain active. I will report it in the maillist. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=113#comment159 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

[tracker] Comment added: Kamailio init script reports falsely "Kamailio already running"
by sip-router 15 Feb '11

15 Feb '11

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#113 - Kamailio init script reports falsely "Kamailio already running" User who did this - Iñaki Baz Castillo (ibc) ---------- Sometime ago I submitted a patch (Marius did it in fact) which iomproved the daemonize of Kamailio, so the parent process comunicates with the main process (daemonized process) via a PIPE and just returns 0 (OK) in case the main process writes "ok" in the PIPE. This just worked. However I saw some changes about such mechanism in more recent commits. I've haven't tested it yet. Which Kamailio version are you running? On the other hand, your patch for the init script is just a workaround (don't take me wrong). The daemon itself is responsible of returning a real status code instead of always returning 0 (ok). ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=113#comment158 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev February 2011